2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forensic application of phylogenetic analyses – Exploration of suspected HIV-1 transmission case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A set of analyses was performed for a definition of HIV transmission clusters, following the strategy of “statistical support of clades plus similarity” that proved to be suitable in our previous investigation of transmission chains in Serbia (Siljic et al, 2013, 2017). Evidence of transmission cluster was characterized by two criteria sets: according to the first set of criteria, transmission clusters were assigned as those monophyletic phylogenetic clades consisting of three or more sequences, fulfilling the conditions of genetic distance of 1.5% or less, with minimal bootstrap support of 90%, and the Bayesian posterior probability of higher than 0.9.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of analyses was performed for a definition of HIV transmission clusters, following the strategy of “statistical support of clades plus similarity” that proved to be suitable in our previous investigation of transmission chains in Serbia (Siljic et al, 2013, 2017). Evidence of transmission cluster was characterized by two criteria sets: according to the first set of criteria, transmission clusters were assigned as those monophyletic phylogenetic clades consisting of three or more sequences, fulfilling the conditions of genetic distance of 1.5% or less, with minimal bootstrap support of 90%, and the Bayesian posterior probability of higher than 0.9.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, relationships between queried and control samples are usually obtained under the light of evolutionary analyses since those samples most likely belong to distant generations [ 52 ]. The evolutionary analysis not only provides the identification of genetic relationships (dealing with questions like, “is the suspect the cause of the studied transmission or outbreak?” or “which individuals were infected by the suspect and which individuals were infected or coinfected from other sources?”) [e.g., 31 36 , 53 , 54 , 55 ], but also allows the estimation of the timing of transmission events (i.e., infection date of each individual, including the individual that generated the outbreak) [e.g., 53 , 54 ].…”
Section: Evolutionary Analysis Of Genetic Data In Forensic Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In NHFG, this statistical parameter can provide a measure of the reliability of relationships between the pathogen genetic sequences of the investigated individuals. For example, a number of forensic studies based on phylogenetic inferences showed a classification of all control individuals in significantly separated clades, whereas individuals related with the studied outbreak or transmission clustered in a unique clade [e.g., 31 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 53 , 54 , 55 ]. Likelihood ratio tests can also be useful for hypothesis testing (i.e., testing if control sequences group or not with the studied outbreak) [e.g., 54 ].…”
Section: Evolutionary Analysis Of Genetic Data In Forensic Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations