2017
DOI: 10.17979/cadlaxe.2017.39.0.3551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forensic anthropological report of Elba

Abstract: This paper presents the results of the forensic anthropological study of human bone remains found in a cave in the area of Pedrafita do Cebreiro (Lugo, Galicia, Spain). The remains correspond to a young adult woman (20-40 years) and an estimated size between 150 and 152 centimeters that was killed by fall in a dolina about 10,000 years ago. The pathology of the bones is also analyzed, indicating, on the one hand, nutritional stress, some signs of osteoarthritis and other traumatic brain injury that did not cau… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Porotic hyperostosis was evaluated on a three-stage scale ( n = 80) and whether the lesions were healed or active ( n = 79) ( 22 ), and linear enamel hypoplasia was assessed as present or absent (i.e., whether one or more linear bands of decreased enamel thickness were visible; n = 81) ( 27 ). The differences in the number of individuals assessed for healed or active lesions are because of the exclusion of a previously published individual ( n = 1 Neolithic) ( 29 ) identified as having active lesions and n = 1 Mesolithic individual for whom the nature of the porotic hyperostosis lesions was unspecified ( 146 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porotic hyperostosis was evaluated on a three-stage scale ( n = 80) and whether the lesions were healed or active ( n = 79) ( 22 ), and linear enamel hypoplasia was assessed as present or absent (i.e., whether one or more linear bands of decreased enamel thickness were visible; n = 81) ( 27 ). The differences in the number of individuals assessed for healed or active lesions are because of the exclusion of a previously published individual ( n = 1 Neolithic) ( 29 ) identified as having active lesions and n = 1 Mesolithic individual for whom the nature of the porotic hyperostosis lesions was unspecified ( 146 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%