2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-25538-0_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forensic Analysis and Detection of Spoofing Based Email Attack Using Memory Forensics and Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, we proposed a multi-layer adaptive framework that uses the computer vision capability of Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to read images on live phishing sites to text, and synthesize speech from uploaded deep-fake videos, while using Random Forest, and LSTM network, along with web scrapped text at various predictions layered of the framework to significantly improve the detection rate and performance of AI-based models for phishing detection. Considering the fact that existing AI-based phishing detection techniques, frameworks, and approaches can only detect text-based [32], [33], [2], [28] or URL-based phishing [27], [32], [34], [35] sites which leads to their vulnerability and inability to detect image-based, or video-based phishing sites, the proposed framework is able to overcome limitations in existing approaches, significantly improve phishing attack detection, and successfully detect complex phishing webpages with multi-dimentional deep-fake videos, images, and texts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this research, we proposed a multi-layer adaptive framework that uses the computer vision capability of Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to read images on live phishing sites to text, and synthesize speech from uploaded deep-fake videos, while using Random Forest, and LSTM network, along with web scrapped text at various predictions layered of the framework to significantly improve the detection rate and performance of AI-based models for phishing detection. Considering the fact that existing AI-based phishing detection techniques, frameworks, and approaches can only detect text-based [32], [33], [2], [28] or URL-based phishing [27], [32], [34], [35] sites which leads to their vulnerability and inability to detect image-based, or video-based phishing sites, the proposed framework is able to overcome limitations in existing approaches, significantly improve phishing attack detection, and successfully detect complex phishing webpages with multi-dimentional deep-fake videos, images, and texts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset was split into two such that 80% was used for training, while the remaining 20% was used for validation tests. We choose random forest because of its suitability for URL-based phishing detection relative to other classifiers [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31].During iteration, we set both the depth and random variable to several values for optimal result but only observed a small but negligible change in the variation of the accuracy until 39. with depth > 39, the accuracy remains constant, at least till when we increase the randomness of the tree to 1 before observing little change. We finally settled on setting the randomness state to 0 so that each tree remains the same each time it is generated.…”
Section: • Layer 1 (Url-based Training)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation