1996
DOI: 10.1177/002795019615600109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign Direct Investment in Central Europe Since 1990: An Econometric Study

Abstract: It is widely recognised that foreign direct investment (FDI) may have an important role to play in the transformation of the formerly centrally planned economies of Central and Eastern Europe. FDI provides a vital source of investment for modernising the industrial structure of these countries and for improving the quality and reliability of infrastructure. In addition new investments may also bring badly needed skills and technologies into the host economy. Evidence from joint ventures in Hungary (Lane, 1994)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The simple relationship between the increase in the stock of FDI and improvements in the trade balance in goods is suggestive -countries with high levels of FDI accumulation export more than those with low levels of FDI accumulation, see figure 2. This hypothesis is consistent with previous empirical work related to foreign direct investment in transition countries (Lansbury et al, 1996, andBenáček et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The simple relationship between the increase in the stock of FDI and improvements in the trade balance in goods is suggestive -countries with high levels of FDI accumulation export more than those with low levels of FDI accumulation, see figure 2. This hypothesis is consistent with previous empirical work related to foreign direct investment in transition countries (Lansbury et al, 1996, andBenáček et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Initially, empirical studies for those countries were conducted treating all the countries in the whole region jointly. Examples of such studies include Lansbury et al (1996), Brenton et al (1999), Benacek et al (2000), Resmini (2000), Garibaldi et al (2001), Bevan and Estrin (2004), Carstensen and Toubal (2004), Cieślik and Ryan (2004), Baniak et al (2005), Gorbunova et al (2012), and most recently also Wach and Wojciechowski (2016). Subsequently, studies for individual CEECs started to appear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average, the nominal appreciation was 6.6 per cent between 1992 and 2003 and 12.6 per cent during 1992 -1997. We see FDI as the main culprit in explaining the real exchange rate appreciation in the four newcomers, which is otherwise at odds with alternative explanations such as the Balassa-Samuelson and external-wealth accumulation effects. The previous empirical work related to FDI in the former transition countries (see Lansbury, Pain, Šmídková, 1996) supports this view. Prior to the EU enlargement, the four newcomers accumulated FDI at an admirable level of 25 per cent of GDP on average (Figure 2).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 60%