2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign body ingestion: Is intervention always a necessity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was following a critical assessment of multiple factors to determine the need and appropriate timing for a commitment to laparotomy, which included the patient's age and presenting complaints as well as the foreign body's initial location, type, propelling rate, shape, size, alignment, and duration of ingestion. After all, it has been suggested that treatment of gastrointestinal foreign bodies must rather be personalized [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was following a critical assessment of multiple factors to determine the need and appropriate timing for a commitment to laparotomy, which included the patient's age and presenting complaints as well as the foreign body's initial location, type, propelling rate, shape, size, alignment, and duration of ingestion. After all, it has been suggested that treatment of gastrointestinal foreign bodies must rather be personalized [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic treatment can be challenging because the estimated risk of complications is as high as 35%, especially if the FB is not removed at the right time [ 13 ]. The success rate of endoscopic FB removal is 95%, while adverse events are rare and include mucosal laceration, bleeding, infection, perforation, or aspiration [ 9 , 14 ]. According to the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, emergency upper endoscopy is recommended within 6 h in cases of esophageal obstruction or sharp objects in the esophagus and within 24 h in cases of other FBs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%