Foreign board members and firm innovativeness: an exploratory analysis for setting a research agenda

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to assess the often repeated, but empirically unconfirmed, supposition that there is a positive connection between foreign board members (FBMs) and firm innovativeness and to set a research agenda for future studies on the topic. Design/methodology/approach The analyses are based on a large sample of firms within the European Union, utilizing patent and trademark data together with information on the national diversity of the boards. Findings The analyses confirm that there is a positive association between FBMs and firm innovativeness. Contrary to expectations, FBMs from less innovative countries than the countries of their host companies are more associated with innovative firms than are FBMs from more innovative countries. Research limitations/implications This study provides empirical support for propositions, drawn from resource dependency theory and group effectiveness/diversity theories, that diverse boards of directors can lead to greater firm-level creativity and innovativeness. It also outlines a detailed research agenda for future studies to build on the tentative findings presented in this paper. Practical implications The findings suggest that greater national diversity in the board of directors can enhance innovation. Originality/value Earlier studies on board diversity have not analyzed empirically the issue of national diversity. The originality of this paper lies in its attempt to address this gap in the corporate governance literature.

The Effect of Board Structure on Sustainable Innovation Capability: A Research on Turkey

“…This indicates the fact that there is an increase in the number of foreign members in the executive positions. The impact of ethnic diversity on innovation capability determined in this study is in parallel with the results of studies conducted by Miller and Triana (2009), Cook and Glass (2015) and Makkonen et al (2018).…”

Integrated reporting quality and BoD characteristics: an empirical analysis

“…This relationship stems from the different perspectives, skills and knowledge as well as varied values, norms and understanding that result from diversity on the board (Ruigrok et al 2007). Consequently, the presence of different culture on the board may enrich corporate decisions and foster a firm's disclosure (Ameer et al 2010;Makkonen et al 2018;Rao & Tilt, 2016).…”

Board diversity and quality of CSR disclosure: evidence from Pakistan

“…Based on the resource-based view (RBV) theory, Kyaw et al (2017) demonstrated that a more diverse board is capable of attracting more resources. Diverse boards improve the firm's strategic decision quality (Rathnayaka Mudiyanselageb, 2018;Michelon and Parbonetti, 2012), identify and fulfill stakeholder's requirements (de Jong and van der Meer, 2017) and improve the firm's reputation and performance (Makkonen et al, 2018;Arora and Sharma, 2016) and global existence (Butler, 2012). Diversity in board composition ensures that novel ideas are brought forward by the board and that a variety of values and behaviors are represented (Murphy and McIntyre, 2007).…”

“…Prior literature supports the positive aspects of national diversity in a boardroom (Makkonen et al, 2018;Ameer et al, 2010). Based on the ideas of the RBV theory, Hsu et al (2013) argued that appointment of multinational directors on the board is one of the most valuable resources of any firm's improved CSR reporting.…”