2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.685783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign and Domestic Ownership, Business Groups and Firm Performance: Evidence from a Large Emerging Market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
351
3
11

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(388 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
22
351
3
11
Order By: Relevance
“…They can also transfer other resources needed to expand abroad internally, such as knowledge. The literature suggests that firms may internationalise by leveraging group resources (Douma et al 2006;Guillén 2003;Tan and Meyer 2010;Yiu et al 2005). Besides accessing the internal pool of resources, synergy between different subsidiaries of an Indian business group can also facilitate internationalisation of the firm; for instance, synergies between the subsidiaries of Tata group (Mukherjee and Radhakrishnan 2002).…”
Section: India: Domestic Capital Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can also transfer other resources needed to expand abroad internally, such as knowledge. The literature suggests that firms may internationalise by leveraging group resources (Douma et al 2006;Guillén 2003;Tan and Meyer 2010;Yiu et al 2005). Besides accessing the internal pool of resources, synergy between different subsidiaries of an Indian business group can also facilitate internationalisation of the firm; for instance, synergies between the subsidiaries of Tata group (Mukherjee and Radhakrishnan 2002).…”
Section: India: Domestic Capital Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In India's case, the role of business groups in economic and business development has been particularly highlighted (Carney, 2008;Douma, George, & Kabir, 2006;Khanna & Palepu, 2000), historically arising when licensing and state restrictions were the norm (Shiba & Masahiro, 1997). The role of diversified (conglomerate) business groups, usually family owned and closely held, is a persistent characteristic of Indian growth (Chacar & Vissa, 2005).…”
Section: Identifying Relevant Informal Institutions In the Bric Countmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as noted above, a distinctive feature is the prevalence of conglomerate business groups entailing common ownership and management by family members; firms are separate legal entities, listed separately with their own set of shareholders, but the family controls the strategic direction and regulates firm transfers (Douma et al, 2006). It has been widely argued that business groups have filled institutional voids such as imperfections in markets for capital, products, and managerial talent (Khanna & Palepu, 2000).…”
Section: Formal Corporate Governance Structures In Bric Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The law and economics approach (e.g., (La Porta et al, 2000;La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, Shleifer, & Vishny, 1998)) puts the focus on the fact that the ability to enforce financial contracts and thus increase the effectiveness of governance depends on institutional characteristics (Djankov, Hart, McLiesh, & Shleifer, 2008;Douma, George, & Kabir, 2006;Hoskisson, Cannella, Tihanyi, & Faraci, 2004). Further, it is stated that in order to complete the frame already set by the agency theory it is necessary to merge it with institutional theory (Douma et al, 2006;Kaplan, Martel, & Stromberg, 2003).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, it is stated that in order to complete the frame already set by the agency theory it is necessary to merge it with institutional theory (Douma et al, 2006;Kaplan, Martel, & Stromberg, 2003). There are two principal strings of institutional theory fitted to the analysis: a) the first, origins in political science (North, 1990) and b) the second is derived from organizational theory (Scott, 2002).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%