2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreground-Aware Relation Network for Geospatial Object Segmentation in High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery

Abstract: Geospatial object segmentation, as a particular semantic segmentation task, always faces with larger-scale variation, larger intra-class variance of background, and foreground-background imbalance in the high spatial resolution (HSR) remote sensing imagery. However, general semantic segmentation methods mainly focus on scale variation in the natural scene, with inadequate consideration of the other two problems that usually happen in the large area earth observation scene. In this paper, we argue that the prob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
96
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Semantic segmentation is an important computer vision task that has advanced significantly due to deep learning techniques [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Most semantic segmentation methods focus on standard datasets, such as MS-COCO [7] and Cityscapes [8], but there is great potential in diverse applications such as remote sensing [9], agriculture [10] and food recognition [11,12]. Unfortunately, methods for food segmentation are still lagging in development and this paper aims to advance the state-of-the-art.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic segmentation is an important computer vision task that has advanced significantly due to deep learning techniques [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Most semantic segmentation methods focus on standard datasets, such as MS-COCO [7] and Cityscapes [8], but there is great potential in diverse applications such as remote sensing [9], agriculture [10] and food recognition [11,12]. Unfortunately, methods for food segmentation are still lagging in development and this paper aims to advance the state-of-the-art.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several state-of-the-art methods were selected as benchmarks, which include three U-shape-based variants, i.e., FC-EF-Res [28], Peng et al [29], and W-Net [34] and four attention-based methods, i.e., DANet [58], FarSeg [57], STANet [6], DDCNN [37]. In particular, STANet was proposed by creators of the LEVIR-CD dataset.…”
Section: ) Comparisons On Levir-cdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, four attention-based methods, i.e., DANet [58], FarSeg [57], STANet [6], DDCNN [37] and two U-shapebased variants, i.e., FC-EF-Res [28] and Peng et al [29], as well as the post-classification-based method proposed by Ji et al [11] were selected as benchmarks. Ji et al [11] are exactly the creators of the WHU dataset.…”
Section: ) Comparisons On Whumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Comparisons on LEVIR-CD. W-Net [3], FC-EF-Res [4], and Peng et al [5], and attention-based methods STANet [6], DDCNN [7], and FarSeg [17] were selected as benchmarks. In particular, STANet was proposed by the dataset's creator.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Approaches 1) Comparisons Of Netwomentioning
confidence: 99%