2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foregoing Rh testing and anti-D immunoglobulin for women presenting for early abortion: a recommendation from the National Abortion Federation's Clinical Policies Committee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research has suggested that the risk of Rh sensitization after early abortion is negligible [34][35][36]. Consequently, the National Abortion Federation has concluded that forgoing Rh typing and administration of anti-D immunoglobulin is reasonable for Rh-negative patients having aspiration abortion before 56 days of gestation and may be considered for all patients having MA at less than 70 days [16,37]. The sample protocol is consistent with this conclusion.…”
Section: Rh Typing and Other Pre-treatment Laboratory Testingmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Recent research has suggested that the risk of Rh sensitization after early abortion is negligible [34][35][36]. Consequently, the National Abortion Federation has concluded that forgoing Rh typing and administration of anti-D immunoglobulin is reasonable for Rh-negative patients having aspiration abortion before 56 days of gestation and may be considered for all patients having MA at less than 70 days [16,37]. The sample protocol is consistent with this conclusion.…”
Section: Rh Typing and Other Pre-treatment Laboratory Testingmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and other professional organizations quickly endorsed telehealth and no-test abortion care. 1 These protocols omit Rh testing 2 and use patient history, rather than routine ultrasonography, to assess pregnancy duration and screen for ectopic pregnancy risks. 3 , 4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidemiological data comparing isoimmunisation rates in the Netherlands, where anti-D is not given to miscarriages under 10 weeks or abortions under 7 weeks, with Canada where anti-D is routinely administered showed that the prevalence of clinically significant antibodies was lower in the Netherlands 18. The American National Abortion Federation has recently recommended not testing or administering anti-D for any abortion under 8 weeks, and to consider not doing so for medical abortions under 10 weeks 19…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%