2019
DOI: 10.1111/obes.12303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting with High‐Dimensional Panel VARs

Abstract: This paper develops methods for estimating and forecasting in Bayesian panel vector autoregressions of large dimensions with time‐varying parameters and stochastic volatility. We exploit a hierarchical prior that takes into account possible pooling restrictions involving both VAR coefficients and the error covariance matrix, and propose a Bayesian dynamic learning procedure that controls for various sources of model uncertainty. We tackle computational concerns by means of a simulation‐free algorithm that reli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as noted above, this form can lead to over-parameterization if no restriction is imposed. Therefore, as an extension of the model used by Canova and Ciccarelli (2009), Koop and Korobilis (2019) proposed a time-varying version that assumes a random walk of the factors…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as noted above, this form can lead to over-parameterization if no restriction is imposed. Therefore, as an extension of the model used by Canova and Ciccarelli (2009), Koop and Korobilis (2019) proposed a time-varying version that assumes a random walk of the factors…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where bold-italicu true^ bold-italict bold-italicu true^ bold-italict = ( Y t X ~ t E ( normalθ t | D t 1 ) ) ( Y t X ~ t E ( normalθ t | D t 1 ) ) and 0<κ ≤ 1. κ is the decay factor. Following the version introduced by Koop and Korobilis (2019), a relatively diffuse choice of an initial value of 0 . 1 × I is set for Σ true^ t .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, by exploiting the time-series and cross-sectional aspects of our data, the panel VAR allows us to model additional complexities than if we had either only time-series or cross-sectional data. Like many static and dynamic panel data models, we are able to control for unobserved characteristics across states that simultaneously determine income inequality and crime using state fixed effects, while the time-series aspect allows us to include sufficiently long lags of the endogenous variables, thereby practically eliminating concerns about endogeneity (Koop and Korobilis, 2016). Third, the time period for estimation, before taking lags, differencing, and other standard data transformations into account, is 1960-2015 (T = 56) for the fifty states and DC.…”
Section: Identification and Estimation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, through PVAR approach, we are able to conquer the issues generated by using granger causality analysis or Vector Error Correction model individually [ 51 , 52 ]. PVAR model enables all variables being considered to be treated as interdependent and endogenous, besides, it is able to model how shocks are transmitted among different countries [ 53 , 54 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%