2001
DOI: 10.1002/for.797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting UK industrial production over the business cycle

Abstract: This paper examines the information available through leading indicators for modelling and forecasting the UK quarterly index of production. Both linear and non-linear specifications are examined, with the latter being of the Markov-switching type as used in many recent business cycle applications. The Markov-switching models perform relatively poorly in forecasting the 1990s production recession, but a three-indicator linear specification does well. The leading indicator variables in this latter model include… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This equation explains the evolution of the indicator based on its own history and the statistical relationship between it and other indicators. In the same way, the economic activity one wishes to forecast is then dened based on its own historic development and the statistical relationship between it and the indicators (Eklund, 2007, Makridakis and Wheelwright, 1989, Armstrong, 1978, Clements and Hendry, 2011 Contrary to this, the Markov switching models assume that the variable one wishes to forecast can exist in 2 or more stages (Batchelor, 2004, Simpson, 2001. It then creates a model explaining the probability that the variable will switch from one stage to another.…”
Section: Econometric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This equation explains the evolution of the indicator based on its own history and the statistical relationship between it and other indicators. In the same way, the economic activity one wishes to forecast is then dened based on its own historic development and the statistical relationship between it and the indicators (Eklund, 2007, Makridakis and Wheelwright, 1989, Armstrong, 1978, Clements and Hendry, 2011 Contrary to this, the Markov switching models assume that the variable one wishes to forecast can exist in 2 or more stages (Batchelor, 2004, Simpson, 2001. It then creates a model explaining the probability that the variable will switch from one stage to another.…”
Section: Econometric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composite indicators are formed as leading, lagging or coinciding indexes, and are created by summarizing the changes in each individual indicators while accounting for importance and volatility of each indicator (Niemira and Klein, 1994, Rötheli, 2007, Simpson, 2001. Mathematically this can be written as:…”
Section: Composite Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulties in the estimation of many previously considered (univariate and multivariate) regime switching models are typically related to the determination of the (unobserved) regimes and their conditional probabilities (see, e.g., Ang & Bekaert, 2002a, 2002bGray, 1996;Simpson et al, 2001). In our approach, parameter estimation greatly simplifies because an observable binary time series determines the regime.…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the fact that the resulting conditional probabilities of the regimes can be constructed with a binary response model simplifying parameter estimation carried out with the method of maximum likelihood. This approach circumvents the difficulties reported in the parameter estimation of various previous models (see, e.g., Ang & Bekaert, 2002a, 2002bGray, 1996;Simpson, Osborn, & Sensier, 2001) where estimation requires the filtration of the latent regimes (see also the discussion in Filardo & Gordon, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation