2016
DOI: 10.4172/2169-0316.1000194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting System Monitoring under Non-normal Input Noise Distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different monitoring approaches have been proposed in the forecasting area. The tracking signal methods have been used to check the bias of forecasting methods (Sabeti et al, 2016) and also warn when there are unexpected outcomes from the forecast (Kumar & Murugan, 2017). Tracking signals can automatically detect changes in the forecast errors when the forecast is misbehaving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different monitoring approaches have been proposed in the forecasting area. The tracking signal methods have been used to check the bias of forecasting methods (Sabeti et al, 2016) and also warn when there are unexpected outcomes from the forecast (Kumar & Murugan, 2017). Tracking signals can automatically detect changes in the forecast errors when the forecast is misbehaving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%