2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08843-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting PM2.5-induced lung cancer mortality and morbidity at county level in China using satellite-derived PM2.5 data from 1998 to 2016: a modeling study

Abstract: The serious ambient fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) is one of the key risk factors for lung cancer. However, existing studies on the health effects of PM 2.5 in China were less considered the regional transport of PM 2.5 concentration. In this study, we aim to explore the association between lung cancer and PM 2.5 and then forecast the PM2.5-induced lung cancer morbidity and mortality in China. Ridge regression (RR), partial least squares regression (PLSR), model tree-based (MT) regression, regression tree (R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the time-updated residential concentration of NO 2 and O 3 are not significantly associated with death from lung cancer, which is different from most other studies [22,23,28], but similar to [56] for O 3 . In the multivariate analyses, we found that all of the input risk factors (male, older age, stage of cancer, early enrollment time, and residential concentration of PM2.5) are associated with a higher risk of death in lung cancer patients, and this is in agreement with the findings from other studies [8,20,22,23,[57][58][59].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…On the other hand, the time-updated residential concentration of NO 2 and O 3 are not significantly associated with death from lung cancer, which is different from most other studies [22,23,28], but similar to [56] for O 3 . In the multivariate analyses, we found that all of the input risk factors (male, older age, stage of cancer, early enrollment time, and residential concentration of PM2.5) are associated with a higher risk of death in lung cancer patients, and this is in agreement with the findings from other studies [8,20,22,23,[57][58][59].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The World Health Organization (WHO) believes that environmental pollution is the biggest threat to human health. Epidemiology has also confirmed the relationship between health problems such as tumors, respiratory diseases, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, and environmental pollution ( 32 34 ). From the perspective of social factors, the length of education and education funding are also closely related to the health of residents.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In recent years, with the popularization of data mining technology and the development of deep learning methods such as convolutional neural network, the ability to predict the risk of lung cancer in patients using clinical data has become more frequent. Many studies focus on the prediction of treatment response and prognosis in patients with confirmed lung cancer 39–43 . Some studies have predicted the risk of lung cancer through well‐known clinical indicators such as age, smoking history, past tumor history, asbestos exposure, COPD, weight, physical activity, and fasting blood glucose level 44 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies focus on the prediction of treatment response and prognosis in patients with confirmed lung cancer. 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 Some studies have predicted the risk of lung cancer through well‐known clinical indicators such as age, smoking history, past tumor history, asbestos exposure, COPD, weight, physical activity, and fasting blood glucose level. 44 Based on the deep learning of image data, 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 or with the help of a tracer, 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 it has become easier to determine whether pulmonary nodules are benign or malignant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%