2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting oil price realized volatility using information channels from other asset classes

Abstract: Motivated from Ross (1989) who maintains that asset volatilities are synonymous to the information flow, we claim that cross-market volatility transmission effects are synonymous to cross-market information flows or "information channels" from one market to another. Based on this assertion we assess whether cross-market volatility flows contain important information that can improve the accuracy of oil price realized volatility forecasting. We concentrate on realized volatilities derived from the intra-day pri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
114
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
4
114
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the ability of these models to show that the relationship between stock market and oil price is Cor(y t,stock , y t,oil ) and Cor(e t,stock , e t,oil ) differ, as they represent different information. Degiannakis et al (2013) and Degiannakis and Filis (2017) report evidence and support the estimation of model framework with mean equation that includes only the constant term.…”
Section: Econometric Methods and Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Despite the ability of these models to show that the relationship between stock market and oil price is Cor(y t,stock , y t,oil ) and Cor(e t,stock , e t,oil ) differ, as they represent different information. Degiannakis et al (2013) and Degiannakis and Filis (2017) report evidence and support the estimation of model framework with mean equation that includes only the constant term.…”
Section: Econometric Methods and Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Hence, we maintain that this is an appropriate framework for modeling and forecasting economic uncertainty. Degiannakis and Filis () further proposed the HAR‐X model incorporating information from exogenous assets. In our case, the HAR‐X model for the EPU t is employed for monthly data in the form:log(EPUt)=w0+w1logfalse(EPUt1false)+w2false(31k=13log(EPUtk)false)+w3false(121k=112log(EPUtk)false)+w4logRVx,t1(M)+w531k=13log)(RVx,tkfalse(Mfalse)+w6121k=112log)(RVx,tkfalse(Mfalse)+εt, where ɛ t is white noise and RVx,tk)(M denotes the monthly realized volatility of the exogenous asset for t − k month.…”
Section: Forecasting Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Against this backdrop, the objective of this paper is to forecast the daily co-volatility of gold and oil futures derived from 1-min intraday data over the period 27 September 2009 to 25 May 2017 (Although the variability of daily gold and oil price returns have traditionally been forecasted based on Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH)-type models of volatility, recent empirical evidence suggests that the rich information contained in intraday data can produce more accurate estimates and forecasts of daily volatility (see Reference [20] for a detailed discussion)). In particular, realizing the importance of jumps, that is, discontinuities, in governing the volatility of asset prices [21][22][23], we investigate the impact of jumps by simultaneously accommodating leverage effects in forecasting the co-volatility of gold and oil markets, following the econometric approach of [24] (applied to three stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%