1991
DOI: 10.1002/for.3980100505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting non‐normal time series

Abstract: We look at the problem of forecasting time series which are not normally distributed. An overall approach is suggested which works both on simulated data and on real data sets. The idea is intuitively attractive and has the considerable advantage that it can readily be understood by nonspecialists. Our approach is based on ARMA methodology and our models are estimated via a likelihood procedure which takes into account the non-normality of the data. We examine in some detail the circumstances in which taking e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various alternative approaches to modelling non-Gaussian time series have been proposed including the Bayesian forecasting models of West, Harrison and Migon (1985) or Harvey and Fernandes (1989), state space models as in Kashiwagi and Yanagimoto (1992), Kitagawa (1987) or Fahrmeir (1992), and the transformation approach of Swift and Janacek (1991). These alternative approaches are outside the range of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various alternative approaches to modelling non-Gaussian time series have been proposed including the Bayesian forecasting models of West, Harrison and Migon (1985) or Harvey and Fernandes (1989), state space models as in Kashiwagi and Yanagimoto (1992), Kitagawa (1987) or Fahrmeir (1992), and the transformation approach of Swift and Janacek (1991). These alternative approaches are outside the range of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advantage of these models is that the estimation and forecasting of non-normal time series can be handled by the standard model-building methodology of Box and Jenkins (1976). However, as pointed out by Swift and Janacek (1991), the optimal quadratic loss forecast of the series (Y,) cannot be obtained as the distribution of the predictor is unknown, and this class of models is only suitable for non-normal data that do not exhibit strong directionality. Note that Yr = T(Z,)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a discussion of non-normality in the time series domain see, for example, Granger and Newbold (1976), Swift and Janacek (1991) and Sim (1994). Further, Peters, Janzing, Gretton, and Schölkopf (2009) evaluate the reversibility of autoregressive moving average (ARMA) models through testing the independence of the error terms and preceding values of the time series.…”
Section: Non-normal Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%