2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-023-01621-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting natural regeneration of sagebrush after wildfires using population models and spatial matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that stand-level estimates of plant cover or counts were more accurate than products that required crown-to-crown matching. Additionally, cover estimates are now possible with satellite imagery leading to opportunities for long-term and historic estimates of population dynamics that are not possible with UAS imagery alone (Zaiats et al 2023). However, in other cases, estimates of individual demography may be required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We found that stand-level estimates of plant cover or counts were more accurate than products that required crown-to-crown matching. Additionally, cover estimates are now possible with satellite imagery leading to opportunities for long-term and historic estimates of population dynamics that are not possible with UAS imagery alone (Zaiats et al 2023). However, in other cases, estimates of individual demography may be required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hierarchical models that partition noisy data into measurement error and process variability are common in wildlife studies and have enabled inference on animal demography from camera trap data, which poses similar detectability challenges to UAS imagery. Adapting these hierarchical models for plant detection from UAS imagery is feasible, including simultaneously estimating the probability of false negatives (failure to detect a focal plant, when one is present) and false positives (incorrect detection due to species misclassification, split crowns, or error in the CHM) (Zaiats et al 2023), and explicitly modeling detection probabilities is likely to improve demographic estimates, particularly for smaller plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(ii) What scales of structural heterogeneity are most sensitive to recovery, measured as the abundance of shrub recruits? As land management in the region increasingly relies on spatial decision-making (Meinke et al 2009;Pilliod et al 2021;Duchardt et al 2021;Zaiats et al 2023), we also determined how maps of structural heterogeneity can predict recovery by asking: (iii) Does a scale-explicit approach to analyzing structural heterogeneity enable out-of-site predictions of native shrub recruitment?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%