2005
DOI: 10.1029/2004gl021718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting lava flow paths by a stochastic approach

Abstract: [1] A stochastic model, named DOWNFLOW, is presented to forecast possible lava flow paths with the aim of hazard assessment and mitigation. The model relies on the fact that lava flow emplacement is, in many cases, controlled by topography. The potential inundation area of the flow is determined by considering a number of steepest paths over stochastic perturbations of the original topography. Since the code requires very short computational time and few input data the model proved to be a very useful tool to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
155
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, more sophisticated lava flow modelling efforts, including stochastic slope-controlled models (Harris and Rowland 2001;Favalli et al 2005), cellular automata models (Crisci et al 2004;Del Negro et al 2005;Vicari et al 2007), and other numerical simulations (Dietterich et al 2015), also rely on high quality DEMs input layers to produce successful results. UAS provide a means of effectively generating these needed DEMs, regardless of the modeling method.…”
Section: Applications For Other Lava Flow Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, more sophisticated lava flow modelling efforts, including stochastic slope-controlled models (Harris and Rowland 2001;Favalli et al 2005), cellular automata models (Crisci et al 2004;Del Negro et al 2005;Vicari et al 2007), and other numerical simulations (Dietterich et al 2015), also rely on high quality DEMs input layers to produce successful results. UAS provide a means of effectively generating these needed DEMs, regardless of the modeling method.…”
Section: Applications For Other Lava Flow Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) are the primary data layer used in models to estimate future lava flow paths and provide flow hazard assessments. The accuracy of the modeled results, either from the paths of steepest descent method (Kauahikaua 2007) or other physics-based lava flow models (e.g., FLOWGO, SCIARA, DOWNFLOW, MAGFLOW), depends strongly on how well the DEM represents the physical environment, which can be difficult to determine in heavily vegetated areas (Harris and Rowland 2001;Crisci et al 2004;Favalli et al 2005;Negro et al 2008). As lava flows change the landscape, subsequent flows will travel along new paths of steepest descent, requiring updated DEMs to reflect the dynamic environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DOWNFLOW is a stochastic model developed at INGV-Pisa that searches for the most likely array of down-hill paths that a lava flow will follow on a DEM of a given spatial resolution, vertical resolution and error (Favalli et al 2005). During each eruption, DOWN-FLOW was initialized upon reception of the new vent location using the 25-m resolution DEM of Piton de la Fournaise based on the 1997 topography.…”
Section: Initialization and Execution Of Downflow And Flowgomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the prior distribution of nodes 1 to 5, we refer to the estimation of the nonmonitoring part in Marzocchi et al (2008). For nodes 6, 7, and 8, we can use results from numerical models that are available for most of the hazardous phenomena related to volcanic eruptions (e.g., Favalli et al 2005 for lava flows; Neri et al 2007 for pyroclastic density currents; Pfeiffer et al 2005 andCosta et al 2006 for ash dispersion). For a more detailed discussion about this point, see (Selva et al 2010).…”
Section: Numerical Models To Define Prior Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%