2008
DOI: 10.1002/for.1064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting euro area variables with German pre‐EMU data

Abstract: It is investigated whether Euro-area variables can be forecast better based on synthetic time series for the pre-Euro period or by using just data from Germany for the pre-Euro period. Our forecast comparison is based on quarterly data for the period 1970Q1 -2003Q4 for ten macroeconomic variables. The years 2000 -2003 are used as forecasting period. A range of different univariate forecasting methods is applied. Some of them are based on linear autoregressive models and we also use some nonlinear or time-varyi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are similar to those found by Maurel (1998), IMF (2000) or Karmand and Weimann (2004). Furthermore, in a recent paper, Brüggemann et al (2008) suggest that it may be reasonable to consider the German pre-EMU data for studying economic problems in the euro area, because data for the aggregate euro area may pose some problems. Similarly, our results also suggest that German data are preferable when analysing Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) accession countries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are similar to those found by Maurel (1998), IMF (2000) or Karmand and Weimann (2004). Furthermore, in a recent paper, Brüggemann et al (2008) suggest that it may be reasonable to consider the German pre-EMU data for studying economic problems in the euro area, because data for the aggregate euro area may pose some problems. Similarly, our results also suggest that German data are preferable when analysing Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) accession countries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable forecasts for the small and medium scale models are estimated for the out-of-sample testing period 1997:Q1 -2010:Q4. The forecasting investigation for the quarterly US data is performed over the one-, two-, three-and four-quarterahead horizon with a rolling estimation sample, based on the works of Marcellino (2004) and Brüggemann et al (2008) for datasets of quarterly frequency. In particular, the models are re-estimated each quarter over the forecast horizon to update the estimate of the coe¢ cients, before producing the quarter-ahead forecasts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The out-of-sample period is 2001:1-2009:4. The forecasting investigation is performed over the one-to …ve-quarter-ahead horizon with a rolling estimation sample, based on the works of Marcellino (2004) and Brüggemann et al (2008) for datasets of quarterly frequency. In particular, the models are re-estimated each quarter over the forecast horizon to update the estimate of the coe¢ cients, before producing the one-to …ve-quarters-ahead forecasts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%