David Hendry has made major contributions to many areas of economic forecasting. He has developed a taxonomy of forecast errors and a theory of unpredictability that have yielded valuable insights into the nature of forecasting. He has also provided new perspectives on many existing forecast techniques, including mean square forecast errors, add factors, leading indicators, pooling of forecasts, and multi-step estimation. In addition, David has developed new forecast tools, such as forecast encompassing; and he has improved existing ones, such as nowcasting and robustification to breaks. This interview for the International Journal of Forecasting explores David Hendry's research on forecasting.Keywords: encompassing, equilibrium correction models, error correction, evaluation, exogeneity, forecasting, modeling, nowcasting, parameter constancy, robustification, structural breaks. We are grateful to Julia Campos, Jennifer Castle, Mike Clements, Vivien Hendry, Rob Hyndman, Andrew Kane, Aaron Markiewitz, Jaime Marquez, Andrew Martinez, Bent Nielsen, Felix Pretis, Angela Wenham, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments and discussion, and to Aaron Markiewitz for research assistance. Empirical results and graphics were obtained using 64-bit OxMetrics 7.1; see Doornik and Hendry (2013).1 Early Work on Forecasting NRE: David, you've made major contributions to many areas of economics and econometrics. These include econometric methodology, general-to-specific modeling, Monte Carlo techniques, software implementation, the history of econometric thought, policy analysis, and empirical investigations of consumer expenditure, money demand, inflation, and the housing market. We discussed these topics at length in Ericsson (2004), so let's focus on another important topic-forecasting. Over the last couple of decades, you've made significant contributions to our understanding of economic forecasting. When did you first become interested in forecasting?1.1 The University of Aberdeen DFH: It was in 1964. I was an undergraduate at the University of Aberdeen, and I was very much influenced by the empirical economic models of Lawrie Klein (1950) and Jan Tinbergen (1951), who suggested that we might be able to forecast future outcomes. In my undergraduate thesis, I estimated a regression model for annual UK consumers' expenditure given current income and lagged expenditure-painstakingly worked out on a mechanical calculator. Using the whole-sample parameter estimates, I calculated a "forecast" of the last observation to see how close it was to the outcome.
NRE:In effect, you were evaluating the last residual of your estimation period. What did you find?
DFH:The forecast and the outcome were reasonably close. That's unsurprising, given how the "forecast" was calculated. Because the forecast was within the estimation period, the corresponding forecast error was included in the sum of squared errors that OLS minimized.
Macroeconometric Models and Predictive FailureNRE: When you were writing your PhD thesis under Denis Sa...