2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting AI progress: A research agenda

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They fed business relationship and financial information into an AI-based technique to construct a forecasting model. Gruetzemacher et al ( 2021 ) described the development of a research agenda for forecasting the progress of AI. It utilized the Delphi technique to elicit and aggregate experts’ opinions on which questions and methods to prioritize.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They fed business relationship and financial information into an AI-based technique to construct a forecasting model. Gruetzemacher et al ( 2021 ) described the development of a research agenda for forecasting the progress of AI. It utilized the Delphi technique to elicit and aggregate experts’ opinions on which questions and methods to prioritize.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the WHO-advised social distancing has led to a more virtual existence, which may accelerate the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Robotics technologies further. During the past decade, AI technologies have been hailed by many academics and practitioners as revolutionary and game-changing in the business world, a sphere in which the AI and robotics activities have significantly increased (Felten et al 2018 ; Furman and Seamans 2019; Gruetzemacher et al 2021 ; Mikalef and Gupta 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a similar approach, Bowles arrived at an even higher figure, claiming that 54% of jobs in the EU and USA were under threat in the same time span (Bowles 2014). Since then, many studies, using a variety of methods have added to these anticipations (Benzel et al 2015;Bruun and Duka 2018;Halal et al 2017;Schwab 2017;Chessell 2018;Gruetzemacher et al 2020;Gruetzemacher et al 2021). In a multi-country approach covering 32 nations, Nedelkoska and Quintini (2018) estimate that 14% of jobs are highly automatable (probability of automation over 70%), 32% have a risk of between 50 and 70%.…”
Section: Pessimistic Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite that, the understanding of firms regarding the long-term social impacts of ML and AI has been modest (Wilson and Van Der Velden, 2022). The uncertainty and lack of consensus among decision-makers and researchers between the positive and adverse effects of ML and AI on society have become an inherent and pending research need (Gruetzemacher et al, 2021). Research studies in the last decade have generally focused more on ML and AI's technical and theoretical attributes .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%