2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1601253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecast Densities for Economic Aggregates from Disaggregate Ensembles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(39 reference statements)
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also demonstrate forecast accuracy improvements for density forecasts using our inflation in parts framework, consistent with Ravazzolo and Vahey (2014) who generate forecasts of inflation that are aggregated from sub-components of inflation.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…We also demonstrate forecast accuracy improvements for density forecasts using our inflation in parts framework, consistent with Ravazzolo and Vahey (2014) who generate forecasts of inflation that are aggregated from sub-components of inflation.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…This CRPS circumvents some of the drawbacks of the LS, as the latter does not reward values from the predictive density that are close but not equal to the realization (see, e.g., Gneiting and Raftery [2007]) and it is very sensitive to outliers; see Gneiting and Ranjan [2011], Groen et al [2012] and Ravazzolo and Vahey [2012] for applications to inflation density forecasts. The CRPS for the model k measures the average absolute distance between the empirical cumulative distribution function (CDF) of y t+h , which is simply a step function in y t+h , and the empirical CDF that is associated with model k's predictive density:…”
Section: Comparing Combination Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the CRPS is thought to have advantages over the log score in that it is less sensitive to outliers and more sensitive to predictions that are close to but not equal to the outcome. Useful references on these density forecast measures include Mitchell and Hall (2005), Gneiting and Raftery (2007), Geweke and Amisano (2010), Gneiting and Ranjan (2011), and Ravazzolo and Vahey (2014).…”
Section: Forecast Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%