2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forearm amputees' views of prosthesis use and sensory feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that, by tuning the modulus, viscoelasticity and temperature of a skin-like coating, the touch from a prosthetic hand can be indistinguishable from a real hand 26 . Restoring both sensory feedback and the mechanical properties of natural skin may allow patients to comfortably use their devices during intimate interactions (for example, when interacting with children) 7 . Flexible electronics 27,28 allow devices to be bent over curved surfaces such as fingers and provide some additional degrees of movement compared with rigid devices.…”
Section: Mimicking Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that, by tuning the modulus, viscoelasticity and temperature of a skin-like coating, the touch from a prosthetic hand can be indistinguishable from a real hand 26 . Restoring both sensory feedback and the mechanical properties of natural skin may allow patients to comfortably use their devices during intimate interactions (for example, when interacting with children) 7 . Flexible electronics 27,28 allow devices to be bent over curved surfaces such as fingers and provide some additional degrees of movement compared with rigid devices.…”
Section: Mimicking Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, while the haptic clothing is a personal device, using this in social settings and combining it with other sensors (e.g., a magnetic compass in Nagel et al, 2005) creates countless possibilities for different social interaction scenarios, from passive, like in a new type of cinema, to active, as in a participatory theater. Finally, our work contributes to the fields of teleoperation and embodying new bodies and objects (e.g., Hohwy and Paton, 2010), expanding the notion of one's current physical body when having a subjective feeling of being "robotic" or "fluid" as in Kurihara et al (2013), and also to limb prosthetics (Wijk and Carlsson, 2015), where full body haptic metaphors may help as a novel sensory substitution strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Prosthetics: In recent years, both the upper-extremity and lower-extremity have received a great attention from researchers [42]. Despite, the success of prosthesis, Kairu et al [42] and [43] noted that most common commercial prostheses can not support users in performing daily living activities such as grasping and holding onto an object without slip, due to either the absence of perceptual tactile feedback or no tactile feedback at all. It was recorded that by measuring the characteristics of touch, tactile sensing can improve the ability of amputee to achieve a stable grasp and prevent slip [44], [45].…”
Section: A Collaborative Robotic Armsmentioning
confidence: 99%