1979
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197907000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forces Under the Hallux Valgus Foot Before and After Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0
5

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
58
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous pressure assessment studies in HV patients suggest a vertical loading shift towards the lateral forefoot [7,[9][10][11]. The results of this study supported this finding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous pressure assessment studies in HV patients suggest a vertical loading shift towards the lateral forefoot [7,[9][10][11]. The results of this study supported this finding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Load bearing capability of the hallux is perturbed in HV, in addition to the unfavorable loading conditions at other regions of the forefoot [7,[9][10][11]. A number of reports explored plantar pressure distribution in order to reveal the foot function in HV patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autoren wie Keiserman, Feltham et al berichten ebenso über eine Zunahme des AOFASScores postoperativ nach Cheilektomie [8,13]. Die Funktion des Fußes, im Sinne einer Tätigkeitsbeeinträchti-gung, konnte ebenfalls gute Ergebnisse erzielen [7,8,12,13,15,28]. Diese war präoperativ durch Schmerz und die eingeschränkte Beweglichkeit im 1.…”
Section: Patientenunclassified
“…Die Resultate des AOFAS-Schmerzscores belegen, dass es nach dem Eingriff zu einer deutlichen Verbesserung der Symptomatik kommt. Diese Aussage belegen Autoren in ihren Arbeiten, wenn sie von postoperativer Schmerzerleichterung berichten[7,12,15,28]. Die Dorsalflexion in dieser Untersuchungsreihe betrug postoperativ durchschnittlich 34,1°(Range 10-80°) und die Plantarflexion 16,9°(Range 5-40°).…”
unclassified
“…Thus, the normalization of the data was made by the body weight (Newtons) of each participant and by the percentage of the support phase. [6][7][8][9] Emphasizing that the body weight data was normalized for each one of the conditions, that is, the participants were weighed barefoot, with the heel insoles, and wearing trainers with the heel insoles. The GRF data is shown as a function of the percentage of support phase (0% to 100%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%