2011
DOI: 10.1177/002070201106600207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forceful Persuasion or Half-Hearted Diplomacy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This diplomacy is referred to as Coercive Diplomacy. Coercive diplomacy is defined as a persuasion to pressure actors involved within, through the use of force, military instrument, economic sanction, trade war or asymmetric agreement (Manulak, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This diplomacy is referred to as Coercive Diplomacy. Coercive diplomacy is defined as a persuasion to pressure actors involved within, through the use of force, military instrument, economic sanction, trade war or asymmetric agreement (Manulak, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alexander George stated that coercive diplomacy is a type of diplomacy that, "in hopes of securing a peaceful resolution of a serious dispute by persuading an opponent to stop or undo his effort to alter the status quo situation." George (Manulak, 2011) mentioned several variants of coercive diplomacy as follows: 1. "Try and see" approach, looking at the threat and finding ways to persuade the opponent to change their stance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary aim of scholarship in the area of coercive diplomacy has been to identify the factors and conditions that will heighten the probability of a successful outcome (Art 2003;Bratton 2005;Byman & Waxman 2002;George 1994b;Jakobsen 1998Jakobsen , 2011Jakobsen , 2015Jakobsen , 2016Kagan 1998;Manulak 2011). George, the pioneer of coercive diplomacy, was acutely aware that many variables could influence the outcome of coercive diplomacy across the wide array of crises that appear in the international political climate.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Srbija se opredelila za politiku vojne neutralnosti, nakon što je u decembru 2007. godine, u Narodnoj skupštini usvojena Deklaracija o Kosovu. 12 Odnos NATO prema Republici Srbiji Događaji na Kosovu i Metohiji kao i u Makedoniji su glavni katalizator razvoja sposobnosti Alijanse da učestvuju u upravljanju krizama. Suprotno krizi u Bosni, NATO se angažovao pre nego što su sukobljene strane došle u "pat poziciju".…”
Section: Politika Proširenja Nato Prema Zapadnom Balkanuunclassified