2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.01.30.478382
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forced proximity promotes the formation of enduring cooperative relationships in vampire bats

Abstract: Spatial assortment can be both a cause and consequence of cooperation. Proximity promotes cooperation when individuals preferentially help nearby partners, and conversely, cooperation drives proximity when individuals move towards more cooperative partners. However, these two causal directions are difficult to distinguish with observational data. Here, we experimentally test if forcing randomly selected pairs of equally familiar female common vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus) into close spatial proximity promot… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In vampire bats ( Desmodus rotundus ), groups can improve the average survival rate of their members (our ‘collective performance’) through a form of non-kin cooperation (sharing blood meals), which works as a collective mutualistic insurance against stochastic individual foraging success [53]. Recent studies suggest this altruistic behaviour develops progressively between any given pair, by establishing a form of trust relationship specific to the partner: individuals are more likely to offer a blood meal to individuals they have previously roosted with and that groomed each other; it is also less likely to happen again towards non-reciprocal individuals [5355]. If we imagine a newly formed group of vampire bats, all initially naïve to each other and to foraging, we could in theory expect the average survival rate of the group to increase through time and across foraging attempts, as members learn to trust each other through their interactions.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Collective Learning: a Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vampire bats ( Desmodus rotundus ), groups can improve the average survival rate of their members (our ‘collective performance’) through a form of non-kin cooperation (sharing blood meals), which works as a collective mutualistic insurance against stochastic individual foraging success [53]. Recent studies suggest this altruistic behaviour develops progressively between any given pair, by establishing a form of trust relationship specific to the partner: individuals are more likely to offer a blood meal to individuals they have previously roosted with and that groomed each other; it is also less likely to happen again towards non-reciprocal individuals [5355]. If we imagine a newly formed group of vampire bats, all initially naïve to each other and to foraging, we could in theory expect the average survival rate of the group to increase through time and across foraging attempts, as members learn to trust each other through their interactions.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Collective Learning: a Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the origins of a social bond developed from a reproductive or kin-based association may be relatively straightforward, other mechanisms of social bond development are less clear [3]. Forced time spent together has resulted in subsequent increased allogrooming in captive common vampire bats [4] and randomly assigned college roommates will develop lasting friendships [5,6]. Time spent together sharing a specific experience may also create new social relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%