2009
DOI: 10.1179/174328108x393849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forced flotation of inclusions in tundish

Abstract: With increased usage of steel for critical applications, the demand for cleaner steel has increased. Existing technologies have been improved and new technologies are being introduced all along the process route to minimise the size and quantity of inclusions. In continuous casting, the function of tundish has changed from its early role as a liquid steel buffer to a multifunctional vessel, dominating quality adjustments, specifically inclusion flotation. To meet stringent cleanliness requirements, a methodolo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the efficiency of inclusion removal has been one of the most important criteria in evaluating the metallurgical performance of any given tundish design. Numerous studies have been conducted to optimize the designs of tundish using various flow control devices [3][4][5] such as weirs, dams, impact pads, turbulence inhibitors, etc. In order to promote the floatation of inclusions, these devices can improve the removal of larger inclusions, greater than 50 μm, but do not necessarily promote the removal of smaller sized inclusions, owing to their extremely low Stokes velocities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the efficiency of inclusion removal has been one of the most important criteria in evaluating the metallurgical performance of any given tundish design. Numerous studies have been conducted to optimize the designs of tundish using various flow control devices [3][4][5] such as weirs, dams, impact pads, turbulence inhibitors, etc. In order to promote the floatation of inclusions, these devices can improve the removal of larger inclusions, greater than 50 μm, but do not necessarily promote the removal of smaller sized inclusions, owing to their extremely low Stokes velocities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%