IECON 2018 - 44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2018.8591492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Force Transmission Interfaces for Pressure Fluctuation Energy Harvesters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to their calculation method, the output density of the present APEH can reach to [34] and [21] achieve higher output power, they exhibit lower power density compared to the present APEH due to larger volumes of piezoelectric materials. Aranda et al [35] designed a PEH with two distinct fluid-mechanical interfaces and it can work under pressure of up to 22 MPa, but the output power and power density are significantly insufficient. In summary, the disk structure is more conducive to achieving higher power density compared to the stacked structure, provided that the piezoelectric material remains undamaged.…”
Section: Comparison With the Existing Pehsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to their calculation method, the output density of the present APEH can reach to [34] and [21] achieve higher output power, they exhibit lower power density compared to the present APEH due to larger volumes of piezoelectric materials. Aranda et al [35] designed a PEH with two distinct fluid-mechanical interfaces and it can work under pressure of up to 22 MPa, but the output power and power density are significantly insufficient. In summary, the disk structure is more conducive to achieving higher power density compared to the stacked structure, provided that the piezoelectric material remains undamaged.…”
Section: Comparison With the Existing Pehsmentioning
confidence: 99%