2012
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00274.2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Force encoding in stick insect legs delineates a reference frame for motor control

Abstract: The regulation of forces is integral to motor control. However, it is unclear how information from sense organs that detect forces at individual muscles or joints is incorporated into a frame of reference for motor control. Campaniform sensilla are receptors that monitor forces by cuticular strains. We studied how loads and muscle forces are encoded by trochanteral campaniform sensilla in stick insects. Forces were applied to the middle leg to emulate loading and/or muscle contractions. Selective sensory ablat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
3
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, stick insect legs do perform stereotypic searching movements in the context of loss of ground contact when reaching a gap (Dürr, 2001), although we do not know whether the multiple stepping that we observed is related to searching. Second, afferent feedback during ground contact in probing behaviour is likely to be different from feedback during ground contact in stance phase, in which the leg supports the body or provides a propulsive force (Zill et al, 2012). Such feedback does matter for inter-leg coordination (Wendler, 1965) and may be different during irregular gaits versus regular ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, stick insect legs do perform stereotypic searching movements in the context of loss of ground contact when reaching a gap (Dürr, 2001), although we do not know whether the multiple stepping that we observed is related to searching. Second, afferent feedback during ground contact in probing behaviour is likely to be different from feedback during ground contact in stance phase, in which the leg supports the body or provides a propulsive force (Zill et al, 2012). Such feedback does matter for inter-leg coordination (Wendler, 1965) and may be different during irregular gaits versus regular ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, campaniform sensilla on the stick insect trochanter are positioned to encode increases and decreases in mechanical load at the nearby leg joint [63]. Campaniform sensilla neurons are active when leg movements are resisted with a mechanical probe, but do not fire during unresisted leg movements, indicating that they encode mechanical load as resistance to muscle contraction [63, 64]. In this regard, the campaniform sensilla perform a function similar to that of vertebrate Golgi tendon organs [4].…”
Section: Insect Mechanoreceptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a control perspective, on the other hand, strong and reliable changes in CTr torques may facilitate the control of stance by means of local load sensors. Indeed, strain sensors in the form of campaniform sensilla are highly concentrated near the CTr joint and are known to provide reinforcing excitatory input to the motor neurons of the depressor muscle [39]. A strong decrease in torques could cause a sudden drop in this excitatory input and terminate the stance phase in a reliable manner.…”
Section: (C) Implications Of Joint Torques For Models Of Walking Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%