2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-75789-2_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Force-Distribution Sensitivity to Cable-Tension Errors: A Preliminary Investigation

Abstract: In order to control cable-driven parallel robots (CDPRs), it is necessary to keep all cable tensions within (positive) known limits during motion. For CDPRs having more cables than end-effector degrees of freedom, a feasible force distribution within cables should be computed beforehand. This paper aims at evaluating how a tension error in one cable affects the overall distribution of tensions in the other cables, by focusing on planar overconstrained CDPRs with four cables. The cable whose tension error more … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, in the HRPCable case, whose cable attachment points are not symmetric to avoid cable interference (see Tab.1 and Fig. 2b), the results obtained with the pair 7-8 are clearly better than the results obtained with other pairs, and could be further optimized, for example by allowing the EE to rotate as demonstrated in [8]. Pair 7-8 not only has the highest percentage of configurations with an acceptable σ among all cable combinations, but it also shows the lowest maximum value of σ in the entire WS (4.41N).…”
Section: A Practical Cable-selection Strategymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, in the HRPCable case, whose cable attachment points are not symmetric to avoid cable interference (see Tab.1 and Fig. 2b), the results obtained with the pair 7-8 are clearly better than the results obtained with other pairs, and could be further optimized, for example by allowing the EE to rotate as demonstrated in [8]. Pair 7-8 not only has the highest percentage of configurations with an acceptable σ among all cable combinations, but it also shows the lowest maximum value of σ in the entire WS (4.41N).…”
Section: A Practical Cable-selection Strategymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A selection criterion for force-controlled cables in hybrid joint-space control was initially proposed in [8] and later extended in [10]. This criterion is based on evaluating a performance index, called force-distribution sensitivity to cable tension error (FD sensitivity, in short), which allows quantifying how the FD is influenced by the tension error in a chosen force-controlled cable set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To face this issue and to exploit all the benefits coming from these multibody systems, optimal design, trajectory planning, and feedback control approaches are commonly studied. As for design, the use of overconstrained or overactuated configurations, together with optimized topologies or force-distribution algorithms, is widely investigated (see, e.g., [2][3][4]). As for motion planning strategies, the literature proposes several techniques to ensure a priori positive and bounded cable tensions along given paths (e.g., [5,6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ref. [28], authors proposed a passive counterbalancing mechanism that enables the CDPRs' platform to provide a desired minimum force magnitude in any arbitrary direction all over the wrenchclosure workspace. In this optimization study, maximizing this force magnitude is considered as a performance index.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mattioni et al [28] investigated the effect of tension error in one cable on the overall distribution of tensions in the other cables, by focusing on the planar overconstrained CDPRs with four cables. In ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%