2020
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Force calibration for an endovascular robotic system with proximal force measurement

Abstract: Surgeons, while performing manual endovascular procedures with conventional surgical tools (catheters and guidewires), experience forces on the tool outside the patient's body that are proximal to the point of actuation. Currently, most of the robotic systems for endovascular procedures use active catheters to navigate vasculature and to measure the contact forces at the distal end (tool tip). These tools are more expensive than the conventional surgical tools used in endovascular procedures. To avoid dependen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides arranging force sensors between the transmission components, Zhou et al of Xiamen University also attempted to arrange a sensing pipe at the front of the robot, and indirectly judged the magnitude of the resistance through the squeezing that occurred between the interventional device and the sensing pipe (35). Hyo-Jeong et al of Hanyang University in South Korea (36) and Sankaran et al of the University of Illinois (37,38) measured the resistance forces based on the input current of the motors. These methods arranged sensors on the outside of the robot, or even used no sensors, to successfully measure the resistance force.…”
Section: A Force Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides arranging force sensors between the transmission components, Zhou et al of Xiamen University also attempted to arrange a sensing pipe at the front of the robot, and indirectly judged the magnitude of the resistance through the squeezing that occurred between the interventional device and the sensing pipe (35). Hyo-Jeong et al of Hanyang University in South Korea (36) and Sankaran et al of the University of Illinois (37,38) measured the resistance forces based on the input current of the motors. These methods arranged sensors on the outside of the robot, or even used no sensors, to successfully measure the resistance force.…”
Section: A Force Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides arranging force sensors between the transmission components, Zhou et al of Xiamen University also tried to arrange a sensing pipe at the front of the robot and indirectly judged the magnitude of the resistance through the squeezing between the interventional device and the sensing pipe [32]. Hyo-Jeong et al of Hanyang University in South Korea [33] and Sankaran et al of the University of Illinois [34,35] measured the resistance forces by the input current of the motors. These methods arrange sensors on the outside of the robot, or even no sensors, and achieve the measurement of resistance force.…”
Section: A Force Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides arranging force sensors between the transmission components, Zhou et al of Xiamen University also tried to arrange a sensing pipe at the front of the robot and indirectly judged the magnitude of the resistance through the squeezing between the interventional device and the sensing pipe [32]. Hyo-Jeong et al of Hanyang University in South Korea [33] and Sankaran et al of the University of Illinois [34,35] measured the resistance forces by the input current of the motors. These methods arrange sensors on the outside of the robot, or even no sensors, and achieve the measurement of resistance force.…”
Section: A Force Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%