2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-0367-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Force-based tool wear estimation for milling process using Gaussian mixture hidden Markov models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All this feature engineering working together with the characterisation of tool wear stages defined in terms of surface finishing were used for training an artificial neural network that achieved 95% accuracy. A more sophisticated approach employing both Gaussian mixture hidden Markov models and back propagation neural networks was presented in [17], where a larger set of statistical features, 18 in total, and correlations have been extracted from force signals. Although these are elegant and robust data-driven methods, the preprocessing and identification of features are the main disadvantages, as these are time consuming and require expert knowledge.…”
Section: Tool Wear Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All this feature engineering working together with the characterisation of tool wear stages defined in terms of surface finishing were used for training an artificial neural network that achieved 95% accuracy. A more sophisticated approach employing both Gaussian mixture hidden Markov models and back propagation neural networks was presented in [17], where a larger set of statistical features, 18 in total, and correlations have been extracted from force signals. Although these are elegant and robust data-driven methods, the preprocessing and identification of features are the main disadvantages, as these are time consuming and require expert knowledge.…”
Section: Tool Wear Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prognostic approaches can be divided into two categories: model-based and data-driven. The first ones rely on the a priori knowledge of the underlying physical laws and probability distributions that describe the dynamic behaviour of a system [5][6][7][8]. Although these have proven to be successful, an in-depth understanding and expertise of the physical processes that lead to tool failure is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To describe the time-variant transition probability of tool wear states and the state duration dependency, Zhu and Liu [11] proposed a hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM) for online tool wear estimation. By extracting features from the force signal in time domain, Kong et al [12] proposed a Gaussian mixture-hidden Markov model (GMHMM) for tool wear estimation. Zhou and Xue [13] reviewed the state-of-the-art methods of TCM in milling processes, and the monitoring models such as artificial neural network (ANN), HMM, and SVM for the categorization of cutting tool states were discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ese works [4,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] solved the problem for recognizing tool wear states in the milling process. However, the models established in these studies are all based on single classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%