Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education

Abstract

Each year Forbes bestows a handful of “edu-preneurs” with the 30 Under 30 Award in Education (Under30), designating those individuals as the best hope for revolutionizing and reforming education. Boasting low recipient rates, Forbes elevates the manufactured expertise of awardees and the importance of their organizations and ventures. Further, Forbes employs the language and norms of neoliberalism to articulate a pro-market vision of education reform. This social network analytic (SNA) study seeks to untangle the edu-preneur network and critically examine the connections between awardees, their organizations, judges, and the larger education reform network. To this end, we utilized descriptive analyses and SNA. We find evidence that Under30 serves as a mechanism for promoting social closure and ideological homophily within education reform networks. Further, we consider the policy implications that such awards may have on public discourse and policy creation.

A Digital Ethnography of Teach For America: Analysis of Counternarrative From the Truth For America Podcast

“…This finding underscored previous research from Kretchmar et al (2014) that utilized a policy network analysis, to create a visual representation of TFA’s key role in developing and connecting personnel, political support, and financial backing to create a powerful network of interdependent organizations and individuals who promote and implement the expansion of charter schools and other market-based reforms. Brewer et al (2018) also found that TFA alumni networks and donors have been a primary ideological and political driving force for privatization and private control of public schools.…”

Comply, Embrace, Cope, Countercrusade, Subvert: Teach For America Corps Members Respond to (Internal) and External Mandates

“…The organization continues to hold a powerful seat at the education policy table (Alter, 2011; Clark, Isenberg, Liu, Makowsky, & Zukiewicz, 2015; Mead, 2015). Yet a growing body of literature continues to call into question TFA’s recruitment, training, and relying on individual narratives of triumph and “saviorism” to sustain an influx of recruits, donors, and positive public support (Brewer, 2014; Brewer, Hartlep, & Scott, 2018; White, 2015; Waldman, 2019).…”