2001
DOI: 10.2307/3061055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging in a Patchy and Dynamic Landscape: Human Land Use and the White Stork

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
67
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
67
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Colonial breeding of storks could be maintained through evolution, as feeding areas of neighbouring pairs are spatially separated from their nesting locations. In consequence, white storks are often forced to make long foraging trips that usually take up to 5 km (Johst et al 2001;Moritzi et al 2001), but occasionally could be even longer (Alonso et al 1994). For the same reason, neighbouring breeding pairs frequently share the same foraging areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colonial breeding of storks could be maintained through evolution, as feeding areas of neighbouring pairs are spatially separated from their nesting locations. In consequence, white storks are often forced to make long foraging trips that usually take up to 5 km (Johst et al 2001;Moritzi et al 2001), but occasionally could be even longer (Alonso et al 1994). For the same reason, neighbouring breeding pairs frequently share the same foraging areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of prey availability and access to suitable feeding habitats in the vicinity of human settlements during the breeding season is rather well understood in White Storks. The species is therefore a good indicator for testing the influence of major habitat disturbances in arable lands, such as agricultural intensification (JOHST et al 2001, TRYJAN-OWSKI et al 2009). Moreover, the White Stork is a good biodiversity indicator (TOBOLKA et al 2012), and so the monitoring of local population changes is important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such phenomenon is expected in central-place foragers, which execute foraging trips to remote locations, but consistently return to a central place, the nest, to deliver food to offspring (Orians and Pearson 1979). In such species, travelling long distances to favourable feeding patches is costly in terms of time and energy (Johst et al 2001), so if food availability allows, they primarily tend to exploit areas in the close neighbourhood of the nest. The evidence that depletion of food availability may increase foraging distances as the season progresses has already been demonstrated for the Spanish population of white storks (Alonso et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even assuming that availability of such prey as insects increases late in the summer, this type of food is associated with low energy intake per time unit, as much time must be invested in food collection. Alternatively, birds may try to locate ephemeral patches of high food availability, such as freshly mowed meadows or harvested fields, but the strategy of optimal patch selection in a dynamic landscape may also be time consuming (Johst et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%