2013
DOI: 10.1111/mms.12064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging ecology and niche overlap in pygmy (Kogia breviceps) and dwarf (Kogia sima) sperm whales from waters of the U.S. mid‐Atlantic coast

Abstract: A complementary approach of stomach content and stable isotope analyses was used to characterize the foraging ecology and evaluate niche overlap between pygmy (Kogia breviceps) and dwarf (K. sima) sperm whales stranded on the U.S. mid‐Atlantic coast between 1998 and 2011. Food habits analysis demonstrated both species were primarily teuthophagous, with 35 species of cephalopods, and 2 species of mesopelagic fishes represented in their overall diets. Pianka's Index of niche overlap suggested high overlap betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the selected model for sperm whales included more dynamic variables, such as NPP and sea surface height (SSH), than that for beaked whales. Canyons and seamounts were included in the selected model for kogiids, suggesting a more restricted habitat than for the other two groups of deep‐divers, consistent with Staudinger, McAlarney, McLellan, and Ann Pabst’s () evidence of how kogiids’ feeding areas are concentrated on the deeper shelf and slope, particularly in the epipelagic and mesopelagic zones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Accordingly, the selected model for sperm whales included more dynamic variables, such as NPP and sea surface height (SSH), than that for beaked whales. Canyons and seamounts were included in the selected model for kogiids, suggesting a more restricted habitat than for the other two groups of deep‐divers, consistent with Staudinger, McAlarney, McLellan, and Ann Pabst’s () evidence of how kogiids’ feeding areas are concentrated on the deeper shelf and slope, particularly in the epipelagic and mesopelagic zones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In this geographic region, both species share a high degree of dietary overlap, suggesting similarities in habitat usage (Staudinger et al . ). Given their shared deep‐diving lifestyle and similar diet, it is plausible that both kogiid species may be exposed to, and serve as hosts for, crassicaudids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Staudinger et al . () demonstrated a high degree of dietary overlap between male and female kogiids (Pianka Index = 0.81), but this sample included immature and mature specimens of both kogiid species. This hypothesis could be tested with a more focused analysis that compared diets of mature male and female K. breviceps .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This complexity can limit our ability to interpret stable isotope results including the various niche metrics. For example, differences in resource availability and the isotopic signatures of basal sources among communities influence the positions of consumers in bivariate space Layman et al, 2007 In most isotopic studies, the foraging behaviour of individuals is unknown and inferred from the isotopic data themselves (Botta et al, 2017;Galetti et al, 2016;Gallagher et al, 2017;Sepulveda et al, 2012;Staudinger et al, 2014). Even when corrected for resource or basal (end-member) signatures (via mixing models; Newsome et al, 2007;Newsome et al, 2012;Post, 2002), niche estimates are difficult to compare among study systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The package also produces estimates of sampling error. Indeed, most current studies of dietary specialization, niche partitioning and competition among individuals, populations and species rely on MCP and SEA techniques to delineate isotopic niche estimates (Botta et al, ; Galetti, Rodarte, Neves, Moreira, & Costa‐Pereira, ; Gallagher, Shiffman, Byrnes, Hammerschlag‐Peyer, & Hammerschlag, ; Staudinger, McAlarney, McLellan, & Pabst, ; but see Sepulveda, Lowe, & Marra, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%