2012
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging costs drive female resistance to a sensory trap

Abstract: Male ornaments can evolve through the exploitation of female perceptual biases such as those involved in responding to cues from food. This type of sensory exploitation may lead to confusion between the male signals and the cues that females use to find/recognize food. Such interference would be costly to females and may be one reason why females evolve resistance to the male ornaments. Using a group of species of viviparous fish where resistance to a sensory trap has evolved, we demonstrate that females expos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…spots of other colours, tail size), but that does not seem to be the case for guppies from the three M. crenulatum sites that have already been examined [20]. Alternate evolutionary responses of females could include a heightened ability to separate responsiveness towards the lure from responsiveness towards the original targets of their bias, such as food or mates [4,40]. Selection could also favour enhanced anti-predator behaviours so that females could better elude prawns' attacks; this could explain the wariness of our sympatric females to the live crayfish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…spots of other colours, tail size), but that does not seem to be the case for guppies from the three M. crenulatum sites that have already been examined [20]. Alternate evolutionary responses of females could include a heightened ability to separate responsiveness towards the lure from responsiveness towards the original targets of their bias, such as food or mates [4,40]. Selection could also favour enhanced anti-predator behaviours so that females could better elude prawns' attacks; this could explain the wariness of our sympatric females to the live crayfish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is still possible that in goodeids, female bright colouration, although different from that of the males, is nevertheless determined by the same genes that produce There is some evidence of genetic correlation between male and female colour patterns in goodeids, but this is limited to one colour marking whose expression, in fact, has been suppressed in some species. The terminal yellow band (TYB), which in several goodeid species constitutes a sensory trap (Macías Garcia & Ramírez, 2005;Macías Garcia & Saldívar Lemus, 2012), is present in females of some species, but, interestingly, it is absent in the species where males exhibit the most conspicuous TYB (Ameca splendens; see Figure 1 in Macías Garcia & Ramírez, 2005 and Figure 3 in Macías Garcia & Valero, 2010). More commonly, female colourful marks are different from those of the males (Figure 3).…”
Section: Although No Systematic Comparisons Of Poeciliinae Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, male water mites Neumania papillator exploit the females' feeding response by vibrating their legs to mimic the vibrations produced by their prey (Proctor, 1991). In several fish species within the sub-family Goodeidae, females show feeding behaviour towards a male ornament located on the tail fin (Macías Garcia & Ramirez, 2005;Macías Garcia & Lemus, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%