2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.13463.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging costs and accessibility as determinants of giving‐up densities in a swan‐pondweed system

Abstract: 2006. Foraging costs and accessibility as determinants of giving-up densities in a swan-pondweed system. Á/ Oikos 112: 353 Á/362.We measured the patch use behaviour of Bewick's swans (Cygnus columbianus bewickii ) feeding on below ground tubers of fennel pondweed (Potamogeton pectinatus ). We compared the swans' attack rates, foraging costs and giving-up densities (GUDs) in natural and experimental food patches that differed in water depth. Unlike most studies that attribute habitat-specific differences in GUD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(71 reference statements)
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The birds usually arrive in the Lauwersmeer area in October and forage on the tubers of sago pondweed (Beekman et al 1991, Nolet et al 2001. The total time spent on tuber foraging in the Lauwersmeer is typically short, as after two to four weeks of massive swan presence numbers quickly drop as a fixed giving-up density of pondweed tubers is then attained (Nolet et al , 2006a. In the autumns (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006) preceding aboveground sampling in summer, 4000, 5500, 2800, and 1200 swan-days (swan days are the sum of daily swan counts) were recorded in the Babbelaar, respectively (Nolet et al 2006b; A. Gyimesi and B.…”
Section: Study System and Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The birds usually arrive in the Lauwersmeer area in October and forage on the tubers of sago pondweed (Beekman et al 1991, Nolet et al 2001. The total time spent on tuber foraging in the Lauwersmeer is typically short, as after two to four weeks of massive swan presence numbers quickly drop as a fixed giving-up density of pondweed tubers is then attained (Nolet et al , 2006a. In the autumns (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006) preceding aboveground sampling in summer, 4000, 5500, 2800, and 1200 swan-days (swan days are the sum of daily swan counts) were recorded in the Babbelaar, respectively (Nolet et al 2006b; A. Gyimesi and B.…”
Section: Study System and Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predation risk also affects site use, in particular for small to medium-sized birds, and is often traded-off against food availability (Clark and Butler 1999;Guillemain et al 2007;Pomeroy et al 2006;Duijns et al 2009;Cresswell 1994). These are also the factors known to affect giving-up densities (GUDs), i.e., the food densities remaining after animals have left a food patch (Brown 1988;Nolet et al 2006a). Hence, GUDs at a stopover site have been proposed to reflect the long-term fuelling rates along the migration route (Van Gils and Tijsen 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Lauwersmeer, an important autumn staging site of Bewick's Swans in the Netherlands, within-year (i.e., spatial) variation in GUD was related to water depth (Nolet et al 2001b), largely due to differences in food accessibility and to a much lesser extent by differences in foraging costs (Nolet et al 2006a). Because accessibility is directly influenced by water levels, we hypothesize that inter-annual (i.e., temporal) variation in GUD at the stopover site is related to yearly differences in initial food density and water level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jonzen et al (2002), Nolet et al (2006) and Raymond et al (2006) reported that tuber density of sago pondweed (Potamogeton pectinatus) affects the foraging of tundra swan (Cygnus columbianus bewickii) in Lake Lauwersmeer in the north of the Netherlands, while Sponberg & Lodge (2005) found that waterfowl in Lake Mattamuskeet, North Carolina, USA, gave up foraging when tuber density of wildcelery (Vallisneria americana) was below a certain threshold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%