1986
DOI: 10.2307/2403083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging by Roe Deer in Agricultural Areas and Impact on Arable Crops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result may have been partially influenced by the evaluation of available biovolume by eye and by the analytical technique of faecal samples (see above). However, fraction of browse well above the expected values were also found in a population of 'field' roe deer in France (Cibien et al 1995), and woodland resources were considered important for forage in a mixed area of arable fields and woods in England (Putman 1986). Damage of field crops by roe deer in the Maremma Regional Park was negligible, despite a generally high supply of cultivated plants in the agricultural site.…”
Section: Roe Deer Diet In Relation To Food Resource Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result may have been partially influenced by the evaluation of available biovolume by eye and by the analytical technique of faecal samples (see above). However, fraction of browse well above the expected values were also found in a population of 'field' roe deer in France (Cibien et al 1995), and woodland resources were considered important for forage in a mixed area of arable fields and woods in England (Putman 1986). Damage of field crops by roe deer in the Maremma Regional Park was negligible, despite a generally high supply of cultivated plants in the agricultural site.…”
Section: Roe Deer Diet In Relation To Food Resource Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In order to limit forest and crop damage, forest management and agriculture policy should consider these mechanisms and the capacity of roe deer to adapt quickly to temporary high-quality forage supply by providing alternative food (Putman 1986;Moser et al 2006). With respect to predictive climate change scenarios, which suggest increasing probability of heatwaves and droughts in summer, the flexibility of forage behaviour may enable roe deer to adapt to changing plant availability patterns, as long as sufficient high-quality food is available.…”
Section: Roe Deer Diet In Relation To Food Resource Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) mostly surrounded by Middle Buntsandstein in the deer roaming range area, the consumption of agricultural fertilized products would have accounted for 30% to the deer diet, assuming similar Sr/Ca ratios for woodland and agricultural plain plants. This is not an incongruous result despite the fact that roe deer is mainly a woodland species (Hewison et al, 2001), because deer also select weed species amongst crops in small woodlands and agricultural areas (Johnson, 1984;Putman, 1986). An important conclusion from our study is that modern faunal samples cannot be used unambiguously to determine the "baseline" for bioavailable 87 Sr/ 86 Sr in past migration studies in areas where fertilizers use has been documented.…”
Section: Geological Vs Biological-available Srmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Putman (1986) found that large herbivores used food from agricultural fields to the largest extent in the vegetation period. Both quantity and quality of this food source greatly surpassed the natural sources and the diet of animals consuming a higher share of cereals was of much better quality than that of the individuals exploiting only the natural sources from the forest environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%