2000
DOI: 10.1080/00063650009461178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging Blue TitsParus caeruleusmay trade-off calorific value of food items and distance from cover

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, by changing their foraging substrate to intermediate vegetation in invaded forests, blue tits can benefit from these greater supplies to feed their nestlings. By altering food density and quality, studies into the optimal foraging strategies of passerines have demonstrated the existence of a trade-off between the risk of predation and foraging far from cover (Schneider 1984;Slotow and Paxinos 1997) and that a reduction in the quality of nutrients available in foraging sites under better cover results in an increased use of more exposed sites (Allen and Harper 2000). Thus, in invaded areas, the increased predation risk for parents coming down from their preferred strata of the canopy to the shrubs may be counterbalanced by the benefits they gain in providing for their offspring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, by changing their foraging substrate to intermediate vegetation in invaded forests, blue tits can benefit from these greater supplies to feed their nestlings. By altering food density and quality, studies into the optimal foraging strategies of passerines have demonstrated the existence of a trade-off between the risk of predation and foraging far from cover (Schneider 1984;Slotow and Paxinos 1997) and that a reduction in the quality of nutrients available in foraging sites under better cover results in an increased use of more exposed sites (Allen and Harper 2000). Thus, in invaded areas, the increased predation risk for parents coming down from their preferred strata of the canopy to the shrubs may be counterbalanced by the benefits they gain in providing for their offspring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model predictions are accessible to study with wild individuals foraging at feeders, and could even be explored using common garden feeders (e.g. [ 27 , 28 ]) provided a suitable technique for avoiding pseudoreplication is used. The predictions made here about behaviour in response to differing distances between the refuge and foraging site are particularly open to experimental manipulation, and broadly match existing empirical evidence (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the potential ease of observing travel to a close foraging site, and the number of studies exploring this form of foraging behaviour (e.g. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][27][28][29][40][41][42][43]), there is little empirical information about this behaviour, and that which exists (e.g. [41], which shows that several species of bird travelled directly between refuge and foraging site without stopping) is anecdotal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Glossy Black‐cockatoos may be at increased risk of predation when feeding in open sites (Allen & Harper 2000), and may limit the time they spend feeding in these habitats to reduce this risk. Raptors are the most identifiable threat to foraging Glossy Black‐cockatoos (Garnett et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%