2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2015.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forage yield and cattle carrying capacity differ by understory type in conifer forest gaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dietary, environmental and economic value of forage in livestock farming performance and profitability have been reviewed by Wangchuk et al [8], Long and Ketterings [1] and Boone et al [9]. Reliable and rapid pasture plant growth is essential for optimal performance of livestock because it provides dry matter nutrition to the animal for conversion to milk, meat and fibre [10, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dietary, environmental and economic value of forage in livestock farming performance and profitability have been reviewed by Wangchuk et al [8], Long and Ketterings [1] and Boone et al [9]. Reliable and rapid pasture plant growth is essential for optimal performance of livestock because it provides dry matter nutrition to the animal for conversion to milk, meat and fibre [10, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A negative relation between forage quality and yield has long been recognized by several authors and, in general, occurs due to the N dilution in a greater biomass production [49][50][51][52]. In the second harvest, as additional evidence for the occurrence of this general quality-yield relationship (not statistically analyzed), the PC level in block one (heavily shaded) was substantially higher than in the other blocks (although the group of more heavily shaded blocks in average were slightly lower in PC than less shaded blocks), while this same block (one) recorded the lowest yields in the second harvest (despite the group of more heavily shaded blocks in average yielding more than the less shaded blocks).…”
Section: Forage Yields and Chemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%