1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002710050046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forage sorghum yield and water use efficiency under variable irrigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
28
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, at water stress condition for biomass sorghum (I_50), the water consumption was of 538 mm (three years average), comparable with the water use of sweet sorghum in optimal water supply (Mastrorilli et al, 1995) showing better water extraction from the soil and appreciable use efficiency to convert water in biomass (5.7 kg m -3 for I_50 vs 5.3 kg m -3 for sweet sorghum) in Mediterranean environment. Reduction in WUE as a consequence of a decline of water used is also reported in grain sorghum: Steduto & Albrizio (2005) Saeed & El-Nadi (1998), in Sudan, with a variation from 8.6 to 6.9 kg m -3 , using a fixed level of water amount (700 mm), but varying the time between irrigation events and the relative amount of water. According to these assumptions, the values of WUE present in this research show sorghum as a valid energy crop in Mediterranean environment.…”
Section: Irrigation and Water Use Efficienciesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this research, at water stress condition for biomass sorghum (I_50), the water consumption was of 538 mm (three years average), comparable with the water use of sweet sorghum in optimal water supply (Mastrorilli et al, 1995) showing better water extraction from the soil and appreciable use efficiency to convert water in biomass (5.7 kg m -3 for I_50 vs 5.3 kg m -3 for sweet sorghum) in Mediterranean environment. Reduction in WUE as a consequence of a decline of water used is also reported in grain sorghum: Steduto & Albrizio (2005) Saeed & El-Nadi (1998), in Sudan, with a variation from 8.6 to 6.9 kg m -3 , using a fixed level of water amount (700 mm), but varying the time between irrigation events and the relative amount of water. According to these assumptions, the values of WUE present in this research show sorghum as a valid energy crop in Mediterranean environment.…”
Section: Irrigation and Water Use Efficienciesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Different authors report that WUE in sorghum is not a stable parameter since it changes among years, environments, phenological stages, soil water and nitrogen plant availability (4.1-6.0 kg m -3 , Mastrorilli et al, 1999;4.4-5.5 kg m -3 , Steduto & Albrizio, 2005;6.5-8.6 kg m -3 , Saeed & El-Nadi, 1998). This WUE variability underlines a limitation of applicability of a "fixed" value of WUE in sorghum in different climatic and environmental conditions, and so there is the need to find alternative approaches in order to make more flexible the use of WUE calculated from different years and locations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are low when compared to WUE values reported for cereal and root and tuber crops. For maize and sorghum, the lowest reported WUE value was 4 kg·ha −1 ·mm −1 [103] while the highest was up to 85 kg·ha −1 ·mm −1 [104,105]. Potatoes on the other hand have WUE values as high as 195 kg·ha −1 ·mm −1 [106].…”
Section: Water Use and Water Use Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For WUE as well, differences are noticeable between sweet and grain sorghum, with an advantage for sweet sorghum (6.0-4.1 kg m -3 Mastrorilli et al, 1995;8.6-6.5 kg m -3 Saeed and El-Nadi, 1988), greater if compared with grain sorghum (4.4-5.5 kg m -3 in Steduto and Albrizio, 2005). Grain sorghum is less suitable for energy production, because it is shorter (1-2 m) than sweet sorghum (up to 3 m) and has a less vigorous stem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%