2021
DOI: 10.1080/09064710.2021.1998593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forage legumes exhibit a differential potential to compete against maize and weeds and to restore soil fertility in a maize-forage legume intercrop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results for the effect of sunn hemp intercropping period (P) and plant density (D) during the two growing seasons (S) on soil fertility properties of the Plinthic Cambisol in Free State, South Africa Sunn hemp intercropping at various maize growing stages and planting densities had no effect on pH between the growing seasons (Table2). This is consistent withKutamahufa et al (2022) claim that the accumulation of different pools of organic matter during the early years of establishing interactive cropping systems is usually too low to affect fundamental soil chemical properties like pH. All the experimental plots' soils were acidic, with pH values ranging from 4.54 to 4.99.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results for the effect of sunn hemp intercropping period (P) and plant density (D) during the two growing seasons (S) on soil fertility properties of the Plinthic Cambisol in Free State, South Africa Sunn hemp intercropping at various maize growing stages and planting densities had no effect on pH between the growing seasons (Table2). This is consistent withKutamahufa et al (2022) claim that the accumulation of different pools of organic matter during the early years of establishing interactive cropping systems is usually too low to affect fundamental soil chemical properties like pH. All the experimental plots' soils were acidic, with pH values ranging from 4.54 to 4.99.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the feasibility of intercropping grain legumes like pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan), groundnuts (Arachis hypogea), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in maizedominated cropping systems to improve food security (Mucheru-Muna et al 2010). Other researchers have investigated forage legume, grass, and brassica intercropping to increase the quality and quantity of biomass production for livestock feed and residual soil fertility (Hassen et al 2017;Javanmard et al 2020; Kutamahufa et al 2022). On the other hand, the latter is given low priority because living mulch growth is managed until vegetative, then terminated due to concerns that it will reduce dominant crop yield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, our results are in agreement with those of Rodriguez et al [ 22 ], who reported an increase in wheat yield when intercropped with Cp over three cropping seasons, as well as other studies that have reported the benefits of cereal–legume associations on grain yield [ 16 , 17 ], who reported an increase in the yield of wheat associated with Cp compared to its sole crop. However, some previous studies have reported that LER values of less than or equal to 1.0 indicate no difference in yield between intercropped and mono-cropped species, while any value greater than 1.0 indicates a yield advantage in intercropping [ 39 , 40 ] confirmed that the LER can be used as a measure of relative yield advantage. For example, a LER value of 1.2 indicates that an area planted with a monoculture would need to be 20% larger than an area planted with an intercrop to produce the same combined yield.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%