2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(03)00316-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forage availability for moose of young silver birch and Scots pine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A stem height of 4 m for birch and 3.5 m for pine may be be the optimal size to provide maximum ungulate forage (Kalén and Bergquist, 2004). Felling trees that reach heights of 5 m may ensure continuous high browse availability without complete removal of cover.…”
Section: Implications For Power Line Row Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stem height of 4 m for birch and 3.5 m for pine may be be the optimal size to provide maximum ungulate forage (Kalén and Bergquist, 2004). Felling trees that reach heights of 5 m may ensure continuous high browse availability without complete removal of cover.…”
Section: Implications For Power Line Row Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…commercially harvested species Scots pine and Norway spruce. Although Norway spruce is not a preferred forage species of moose (Cederlund et al, 1980;Hornberg, 2001;Kalen and Bergquist, 2004) it was included because of previously observed leader stem browsing in the vicinity of feeding stations (Gundersen et al, 2004). Gundersen et al (2004) quantified moose browsing pressure on Scots pine and Norway spruce around 30 feeding stations during spring 1998 using circular sampling plots of 50 m 2 located at 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200 m from feeding stations (for methodological details see Gundersen et al, 2004).…”
Section: Quantifying Browsing Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…leader stem browsing; Gill, 1992;Bergqvist et al, 2001). Throughout Scandinavia, the main conflict between forestry interests and moose concerns recurrent browsing on commercially valuable young Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) stands during winter (Danell et al, 1991b;Edenius, 1993;Ball and Dahlgren, 2002;Bergqvist et al, 2003;Kalen and Bergquist, 2004). The impact on young trees can be severe where local moose densities are high (Lavsund, 1987;Andren and Angelstam, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Browsing in forests threatens forest regeneration because it affects tree OPEN ACCESS growth and survival as well as lowers timber quality [5][6][7][8][9]. Although attempts have been made to reduce browsing damage by reducing browsing ungulate population densities through culling [10] it has not been very successful [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%