2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04653-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forage availability and maternal characteristics affect costs of reproduction in a large marsupial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2018; Toni et al . 2020), so this measure will be subject to some variation. Nonetheless, our results confirm that irruption phases can be distinguished using reproductive rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2018; Toni et al . 2020), so this measure will be subject to some variation. Nonetheless, our results confirm that irruption phases can be distinguished using reproductive rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Births of EGK are concentrated in summer in south-eastern Australia (Poole 1983) and young remain in the pouch for about 10 months (Poole 1975), so surveys of reproductive rate should be conducted in winter or spring to enhance detection of pouch young, which are evident from distention of the pouch. Female reproductive rate in EGK can be influenced by a number of other factors, such as foraging rate, body size and age (G elin et al 2015;Quesnel et al 2018;Toni et al 2020), so this measure will be subject to some variation. Nonetheless, our results confirm that irruption phases can be distinguished using reproductive rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…body condition that individuals need to face the next rutting season [96][97][98]. For instance, autumn rains affected the availability of biomass and grass in late spring and early summer, and therefore, they may influence deer body condition for reproduction [99,100].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experimental approach is therefore necessary to disentangle the effects of environmental conditions and individual quality, by changing the parental effort while leaving the environmental conditions unchanged (Ruffino et al, 2014 ). Despite the fact that additional food‐dependent survival costs of reproduction are expected to affect population growth rate, only few studies have experimentally investigated the effect of habitat quality on costs of reproduction (see e.g., Barbraud & Weimerskirch, 2005 ; Hamel, Côté, et al, 2010 ; Toni et al, 2020 ). Therefore, demographic and evolutionary consequences of variation in natural food availability can be considerably underestimated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%