2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-37661-0_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

For the Smarter Good of Cities: On Cities, Complexity and Slippages in the Smart City Discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Modern cities are exposed to increasing levels of competition, market deregulation, resource constraints and marketisation (Skelcher et al , 2013; Kornberger and Carter, 2010). In this challenging context, cities strive for smart development, and attempt to realise their vision through programmes aimed at improving the economy and efficiency of public service delivery (Cocchia, 2014; Steiner and Veel, 2014; Lapsley et al , 2010). In the last two decades, much has been written about the smart city as a modern model of urban governance that accommodates the early trends of globalisation and neo-liberalisation (Brenner and Kiel, 2014; Grossi and Pianezzi, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern cities are exposed to increasing levels of competition, market deregulation, resource constraints and marketisation (Skelcher et al , 2013; Kornberger and Carter, 2010). In this challenging context, cities strive for smart development, and attempt to realise their vision through programmes aimed at improving the economy and efficiency of public service delivery (Cocchia, 2014; Steiner and Veel, 2014; Lapsley et al , 2010). In the last two decades, much has been written about the smart city as a modern model of urban governance that accommodates the early trends of globalisation and neo-liberalisation (Brenner and Kiel, 2014; Grossi and Pianezzi, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost without exception, these are critical data studies, problematizing data- and future-driven urban practices [ [83] , [84] , [85] ], from which strongly negative attitudes towards the smart city concept have also emerged [ [86] , [87] ], but suggestions as well for a broader interdisciplinary research agenda [ [88] , [89] , [90] ]. On the other hand, positive potentials [ 91 ] specifically regarding socially beneficial implications [ 92 ] and digital innovations for urban sustainability are also considered [ [93] , [46] ].…”
Section: Foucault and The Smart Citymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta clasificación puede observarse en la Tabla 1. Investigadores y especialistas en urbanismo manejan conceptos como ciudades más inteligentes (smarter cities) [24], [25], [26]; ciudades sostenibles [27], [28]; ciudades compactas (compact city) [29], [30]; y el nuevo urbanismo (new urbanism), este último, considerado por algunos como el futuro del diseño inteligente de las poblaciones humanas [31], [32]; esto último ha sido rechazado por otros autores debido a la falta de condiciones sociales que proporciona [33], [34], [35]. Tabla 1 Clasificación de Factores Sociales.…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified