2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcm.2013.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

For the people: Defining communities of readership through an Appraisal comparison of letters to two South African newspapers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to appraisal applied into media reception research, Coffin and O’Halloran’s (2005, 2006) appraisal analysis of newspaper corpora and dynamic reader positioning indicates the significance of the readers’ negotiation of emotional responses in future empirical studies. Based on a contrast study of letters to tabloid and mainstream newspapers, Smith and Adendorff (2014) reveal readers’ affiliation around a bond with valuation concerning the topic of education. Chatterje-Doody and Crilley (2019), adopting the concept of “affective investments”, explore online audiences’ emotional reactions to media images of war.…”
Section: Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to appraisal applied into media reception research, Coffin and O’Halloran’s (2005, 2006) appraisal analysis of newspaper corpora and dynamic reader positioning indicates the significance of the readers’ negotiation of emotional responses in future empirical studies. Based on a contrast study of letters to tabloid and mainstream newspapers, Smith and Adendorff (2014) reveal readers’ affiliation around a bond with valuation concerning the topic of education. Chatterje-Doody and Crilley (2019), adopting the concept of “affective investments”, explore online audiences’ emotional reactions to media images of war.…”
Section: Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appraisal System, which explores the -interpersonal metafunction‖ Halliday and Matthiessen (2014) of language, is an important development of Halliday's Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). It is a useful tool for discourse analysis of various genres, including official statements or reports (Huan, 2016a;Li and Xu, 2018;Smith and Adendorff, 2014;Swain, 2012;Vertommen et al, 2012) and comparatively more personal texts such as Trump's tweets (Ross and Caldwell, 2020), personal emails (Ho, 2014), online hotel reviews (Tian, 2013), academic thesis (Geng and Wharton, 2019) and doctors' discourse (Gallardo and Ferrari, 2010). The present study, endeavoring to analyze news discourse, will also adopt Appraisal System as the analytical framework.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(08_PD) 2 The use of positive Judgment resources appropriately and correct demonstrates the reader's support of the position being put in the text: that China should take countermeasure action against the United States, while the negative Judgment protectionism and Attitude hurts show the reader's opposite position toward U.S. punitive tariff. At the same time, the reader is able to affiliate with other readers who share his or her value position and defend against those who may be on the side of the United States, thus form different imagined (Smith and Adendorff, 2014) or ambient (Zappavigna, 2011) online reading communities.…”
Section: Appraisal Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more recent audience studies, Smith and Adendorff (2014) combine corpus linguistics and Appraisal to investigate how different reading communities bond around the value of education through letters from tabloid readers and mainstream newspaper readers in South Africa. Kyriakidou (2015) proposes a framework for categorizing audience engagement with media stories as four types of (emotional) ‘media witnessing’ and examines this in an empirical study of Greek audience’s responses to human distant suffering.…”
Section: Reading Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%