2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

For flux's sake: General considerations for energy‐flux calculations in ecological communities

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main assumption of this approach is the system's equilibrium or steady state (Barnes et al, 2018 ), implying that the total amount of energy lost by a species, either by predation or physiological processes, is exactly compensated by the metabolized energy it gains from consumption. That is, species loss to predation and metabolism are completely balanced by energetic gains, which are defined as incoming fluxes multiplied by assimilation efficiencies (Jochum et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main assumption of this approach is the system's equilibrium or steady state (Barnes et al, 2018 ), implying that the total amount of energy lost by a species, either by predation or physiological processes, is exactly compensated by the metabolized energy it gains from consumption. That is, species loss to predation and metabolism are completely balanced by energetic gains, which are defined as incoming fluxes multiplied by assimilation efficiencies (Jochum et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach assumes the system’s equilibrium or steady state, implying that the total amount of energy lost by a species, either by consumption or physiological processes, is exactly compensated by the metabolized energy it gains from consumption. This means that each species loss to predation and metabolism is balanced by its energetic gains, which are defined as incoming fluxes multiplied by assimilation efficiencies ( 64 ). For instance, to calculate energy flux from a food chain (i.e., species A is eaten by species B, which is consumed by species C), we start from the top predator (species C in the food chain) and assess how much energy this species needs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This loss to consumption is then added to the energy demand of the prey species itself (species B) to represent the joint energy loss of this species that needs to be compensated by the next-lower level (species A), and so on. Therefore, top predators (species without predators) only have metabolic losses, while their prey, the herbivores, have both losses due to metabolism and consumption ( 64 ). The interaction-strength calculations in a food chain or food web begin from the top predator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the weight of an individual) and abundances (no. of individuals per unit area) across species (De Ruiter et al 1995, Neutel et al 2002, Barnes et al 2016, 2018, Jochum et al 2021a). Therefore, fluctuations in the community composition and species' relative densities in soil communities affect the flux of energy through the trophic levels (Schwarz et al 2017) and, consequently, trophic multifunctionality (Potapov et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%