1954
DOI: 10.2307/772552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

For Better Undergraduate Teaching in Art History

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Korean subtitles are only partially provided and even viewed with Google Translator which sometimes mistranslates art terms. Elsen (1954) argued that discussion is a useful pedagogical approach to sharing a variety of viewpoints and backgrounds when analyzing artworks. Also, in the experiment of Donahue-Wallace & Chanda (2005), when face-to-face interaction was not possible in art history online classes, learning was well achieved even when an alternative means called animated interactive activities were used, and the interaction between students was improved.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Korean subtitles are only partially provided and even viewed with Google Translator which sometimes mistranslates art terms. Elsen (1954) argued that discussion is a useful pedagogical approach to sharing a variety of viewpoints and backgrounds when analyzing artworks. Also, in the experiment of Donahue-Wallace & Chanda (2005), when face-to-face interaction was not possible in art history online classes, learning was well achieved even when an alternative means called animated interactive activities were used, and the interaction between students was improved.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Concerns over how art history is taught, both in the classroom and outside it, are far from new. Since the early 20 th -century art historians have called for pedagogical change at the undergraduate level (Chalmers 1978;DeAngelis 1987;Dietrich & Smith-Hurd 1995;Donahue-Wallace, La Follette & Pappas 2009;Elsen 1954;Gasper-Hulvat 2017;Kerin & Lepage 2016;La Follette 2017;Erickson 1983;Olds 1986;Panofsky 1954;Yokley 1999). Meanwhile, since at least the 1980s, art historians have argued for revising, dismantling and, even, "firing" the canon based upon white, male, European, heteronormative artists and their masterpieces (Barzman 1994;Chandra et al 2016;Camille et al 1996;Mast 2019;Nochlin 1971;Pinder 2013;Pollock 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%