2016
DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

For Better or for Worse? Gender Ideology, Religious Commitment, and Relationship Quality

Abstract: Few studies have considered how religion moderates the ways gender ideology influences heterosexual relationship outcomes. Drawing on a national random sample of American adults who report being married or living as married, we focus on the extent to which religious commitment moderates the link between gender ideology and reported relationship satisfaction, and whether this moderating effect varies across gender. We find that gender traditionalism is negatively associated with relationship satisfaction; howev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The alpha reliability coefficient for this index is .77. These four items are quite similar to those consistently utilized in gender ideology indexes (Davis and Greenstein ; Perry and Whitehead ; Whitehead ). This particular scale ranges from 0 to 12 with a mean of 3.44 (see Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The alpha reliability coefficient for this index is .77. These four items are quite similar to those consistently utilized in gender ideology indexes (Davis and Greenstein ; Perry and Whitehead ; Whitehead ). This particular scale ranges from 0 to 12 with a mean of 3.44 (see Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Of course, this may not be the case for all couples. For instance, individuals who hold traditional ideological views of gender or who hold conservative religious convictions are more likely to interpret traditionally gendered arrangements as fair and may therefore be happier in such marriages (Kalmijn, De Graaf, & Poortman, 2004;Perry & Whitehead, 2016). Another example is that of LGBT couples.…”
Section: Equality: An Increasingly Popular Family Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…items are quite similar to those consistently utilized in gender ideology indexes (Davis and Greenstein 2009;Perry and Whitehead 2016;Whitehead 2014). This particular scale ranges from 0 to 12 with a mean of 3.44 (see Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%