For Better, For Worse, or Both? Testing Environmental Sensitivity Models with Parenting at the Level of Individual Families

Abstract

According to environmental sensitivity models, children vary in responsivity to parenting. However, different models propose different patterns, with responsivity to primarily (1)adverse parenting (adverse sensitive) or (2) supportive parenting (vantage sensitive), or (3) to both (differentially susceptible). This preregistered study tested whether these three responsivity patterns coexist. We used intensive longitudinal data of Dutch adolescents (N =256, Mage = 14.8, 72% female) who bi-weekly reported on adverse and supportive parenting and their psychological functioning (t = 26). Dynamic Structural Equation Models (DSEM)with more than 4,600 observations indeed revealed differential parenting effects. As hypothesized, we found that all three responsivity patterns coexisted in our sample: 5% were adverse sensitive, 3% vantage sensitive, and 26% differentially susceptible. No adolescent appeared unsusceptible, however. Instead, we labeled 28% as low-perceptive, because they did not perceive any changes in parenting and showed lower trait levels of environmental sensitivity than others. Additionally, unexpected patterns emerged, with 37% responding contrary to parenting theories (e.g., decreased psychological functioning after more parental support). Overall, findings indicate that theorized responsivity-to-parenting patterns might coexist in the population, and that there are other, previously undetected patterns that go beyond environmental sensitivity models.