2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

For-Benefit Company (fBComp): An innovative social-business model. The Italian case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A review of the literature on BMI shows that researchers have focused primarily on the context of financial goals-i.e., how BMI can enable companies to create and capture economic value , Czinkota et al, 2018). Yet, a recent shift has taken place whereby a new pattern that addresses environmental and social issues (in addition to economic ones) has emerged as a potential avenue for the transformation of existing BMs , Geissdoerfer et al, 2018, Goworek et al, 2018, Spieth et al, 2018.…”
Section: Business Model Innovation (Bmi) For Social Purposesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A review of the literature on BMI shows that researchers have focused primarily on the context of financial goals-i.e., how BMI can enable companies to create and capture economic value , Czinkota et al, 2018). Yet, a recent shift has taken place whereby a new pattern that addresses environmental and social issues (in addition to economic ones) has emerged as a potential avenue for the transformation of existing BMs , Geissdoerfer et al, 2018, Goworek et al, 2018, Spieth et al, 2018.…”
Section: Business Model Innovation (Bmi) For Social Purposesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, in both cases, the new BM should preserve the economic viability of the organisation (Geissdoerfer et al, 2018). Interestingly, the latter scenario (i.e., sustainable BMI addressing social problems) has bred new archetypes of organizations that pursue the creation of social impact while remaining economically viable (Czinkota et al, 2018, Evans et al, 2017. Arguably, SPOs have emerged in response to the failure of the three sectors (i.e., private, public, and non-profit) to offer sustainable solutions to society's chronic problems (Austin et al, 2006, Dacin et al, 2011.…”
Section: Business Model Innovation (Bmi) For Social Purposesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, an understanding of how CSR influences BM innovation is lacking because the examination of the process mechanism underlying the link between CSR and BM innovation has been neglected. The existing literature has mainly discussed the direct influence of CSR on BM innovation [28,32], resulting in managers' limited understanding of how to innovate their BMs based on CSR. Therefore, the existing literature is unable to provide an answer to the question of how firms incorporate CSR into their BMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect is evident today in new legal forms that institutionalise commitments to market‐action with a social purpose and trading firms that use market‐action to generate and reinvest philanthropic capital (Yunus, 2007). In addition to foundations directly owning a large number of SE subsidiaries (e.g., BRAC in Bangladesh), a plethora of legal forms have been created to support this approach: Low‐Profit (L3C) and Public Benefit Corporations in the US (PBCs); Community Interest Companies (CICs) and Charitable Incorporated Organisations (CIOs) in the United Kingdom; Certified Non‐Profits and Social Welfare Corporations in Japan; For‐Benefit Companies in Italy; the spread of social‐purpose company laws across EU nation states (Bull, 2018; Czinkota, Kaufmann, Basile, & Ferri, 2018; Defourny & Nyssens, 2015; Galera & Borzaga, 2009; Ridley‐Duff & Bull, 2019a).…”
Section: The Sse: the Rise Of Internet Platforms In A Digital Economymentioning
confidence: 99%